This week we dig into the chaos of Trump’s Strait of Hormuz oil blockade, and why the ASX is shrugging off the end of the world. Tony does a Pulled Pork on Perth property developer Peet (PPC) — a 130-year-old land syndicator with a Goldman Sachs-driven strategic review swirling around it — and we get a Stock Doctor data alert affecting 100+ dividend-paying stocks that every QAV investor needs to know about. After hours: Rory McIlroy at Augusta, John Candy, Otis Redding, and mangrove seeds.
This week’s full episode is for QAV Club members only. The free episode is available below. Also check out our podcast archives link and our pages on Apple Podcasts or Spotify or watch clips on TikTok. Or visit our homepage to learn more about QAV and how it works as a value investing system that you can learn and apply to beat the market.
Transcription
QAV AU 915 Club
[00:00:00] Cameron Reilly: Worked. I worked, worked my normal hours. But instead of gonna kungfu, we went to the beach. So let’s change it up a bit.
[00:00:06] Tony Kynaston: Yeah. Good.
[00:00:07] Cameron Reilly: Welcome back to QAV Australia. [00:00:10] TK 9 1 5 is the episode number 14th of April, 2026. You know what, Tony? [00:00:20] Uh, why did the chicken cross the road? Why did Trump, why did Trump wanna Ronda open the effing straight so he could close the effing straight? That was D [00:00:30] chess, Tony.
[00:00:33] Tony Kynaston: Yeah. And
[00:00:34] Cameron Reilly: my God.
[00:00:35] Tony Kynaston: yeah, the old price was getting too low.
[00:00:38] Cameron Reilly: Yeah.
[00:00:39] Tony Kynaston: Mm.
[00:00:39] Cameron Reilly: [00:00:40] Hey, uh, I got some, I, I’m gonna got some quotes here about Trump. I’m gonna read you these quotes. I want you to guess who said these things. I. I go back and forth between [00:00:50] thinking Trump is a cynical asshole like Nixon, who wouldn’t be that bad and might even prove useful, or that he’s America’s Hitler.
[00:00:57] Tony Kynaston: Wow. My, my first thought was Hunter [00:01:00] s Thompson, but he’s dead. So Matt Taibbi, the son of, son of Hunter s Thompson in spirit.
[00:01:07] Cameron Reilly: No. I’ll read another quote from the [00:01:10] same person. You can keep guessing. Mr. Trump is unfit for our nation’s highest office.
[00:01:15] Tony Kynaston: Oh, that’d be someone like Paul Krug. Paul Krugman.
[00:01:19] Cameron Reilly: [00:01:20] No, same person. Trump’s promises are the needle in America’s collective vein.
[00:01:25] Tony Kynaston: Mm. Rupert Murd.
[00:01:28] Cameron Reilly: Hmm, same person. [00:01:30] Um. agree with you on Trump because I don’t think he’s that person. I don’t think he actually cares about folks. This is responding to a radio host calling Trump a [00:01:40] total fraud. I agree with you on Trump.
[00:01:43] Tony Kynaston: Yeah, no idea. I’ve run out of thoughts
[00:01:46] Cameron Reilly: said, fellow Christians, everyone is watching us when we [00:01:50] apologize for this man. Lord, help us. He also said, Trump’s
[00:01:55] Tony Kynaston: The Pope
[00:01:55] Cameron Reilly: is a biggest failure as a, as a political leader, is that he [00:02:00] sees the worst in people and he encourages the worst in people. Those were all quotes from jd.
[00:02:07] Cameron Reilly: Those were all quotes from JD Vance, uh, in [00:02:10] 2016. Tony?
[00:02:11] Tony Kynaston: before he became vice president.
[00:02:13] Cameron Reilly: Yeah.
[00:02:13] Tony Kynaston: Yeah. It’s, it’s a, it’s a wonder. We can dig those up. You would’ve, um, deleted a lot of them, I would’ve [00:02:20] thought.
[00:02:20] Cameron Reilly: Different
[00:02:21] Tony Kynaston: Mm-hmm.
[00:02:22] Cameron Reilly: talking about Trump. He is a con artist. He runs on this idea. He is fighting for the little guy, but he’s spent his entire career sticking it to the little guy. [00:02:30] We shouldn’t entrust the nuclear codes of the United States to an erratic individual and the conservative movement to someone who has spent a career sticking it to working [00:02:40] people. He’s a third world strong man and for years to come. There are many people on the right in the media and voters at large that are going to be [00:02:50] having to explain and justify how they fell into this trap of supporting Donald Trump because this is not gonna end well one way or the other.
[00:02:57] Tony Kynaston: Well, that sounds like someone who was [00:03:00] beaten by Trump in the primary. Someone like, uh, Kerry or Rubio.
[00:03:05] Cameron Reilly: Rubio
[00:03:06] Tony Kynaston: Yeah, there you go.
[00:03:07] Cameron Reilly: Kerry’s a Democrat and he was long gone
[00:03:09] Tony Kynaston: Oh, sorry.
[00:03:09] Cameron Reilly: [00:03:10] came around. But
[00:03:10] Tony Kynaston: Yeah.
[00:03:11] Cameron Reilly: Those are quotes from Marco Rubio,
[00:03:12] Tony Kynaston: Yeah.
[00:03:14] Cameron Reilly: in 2016. I’ve got quotes similar. Lindsey Graham, Ted Cruz, Nikki [00:03:20] Haley, um, yeah, Nikki Haley said No matter what it is, follows him.
[00:03:27] Cameron Reilly: Rightly or wrongly, chaos follows him in. America is [00:03:30] tired
[00:03:31] Tony Kynaston: Yeah, that’s a good point. That’s prob, that’s probably how I feel the most about Trump at the moment. He’s like an exhausting kid who’s gone off the rails and you just sort of sit [00:03:40] down, sigh, where do I start? You’ve done bad. Just know you’ve done bad. Let’s, can we both agree on [00:03:50] that?
[00:03:50] Cameron Reilly: Uh, so Trump is stopping oil from leaving the Strait of Urs. Most of
[00:03:58] Tony Kynaston: Mm-hmm.
[00:03:58] Cameron Reilly: would be going to China, [00:04:00] Andra, and India.
[00:04:01] Tony Kynaston: Yep.
[00:04:02] Cameron Reilly: Now, I
[00:04:04] Tony Kynaston: It’s actually quite smart.
[00:04:05] Cameron Reilly: I know you know your history better than most Tony, [00:04:10] but why did the US get involved in World War ii?
[00:04:13] Tony Kynaston: Uh, the bombing of Pearl Harbor.
[00:04:15] Cameron Reilly: Why did the Japanese bomb Pearl Harbor?
[00:04:18] Tony Kynaston: Mm, [00:04:20] they’re running out of oil. I’m gonna guess,
[00:04:22] Cameron Reilly: And who stopped them from getting oil
[00:04:25] Tony Kynaston: uh, was it Truman, was he the president back then? No. It would’ve been Roosevelt. [00:04:30] Yeah. Mm-hmm.
[00:04:31] Cameron Reilly: The Americans blocked Japan’s oil supply, which is why they bombed Pearl Harbor in the first place. It was a declaration of war by the [00:04:40] Americans on Japan, effectively economic warfare preventing them from getting oil. They needed oil ’cause they were fighting with China. And so, uh, yeah, so [00:04:50] not a good history of when you stop powerful countries from getting oil
[00:04:54] Tony Kynaston: Well, I think, I think the logic behind, if there is logic behind chaos, if [00:05:00] the logic behind his move is that, uh, China will apply pressure on Iran to come to the table and negotiate to, to keep the [00:05:10] oil moving.
[00:05:10] Cameron Reilly: or China will sell warships into the strait of, for Mabb and say, we’re taking our oil. Thank you very much.
[00:05:18] Tony Kynaston: Yeah, that, that’s a possibility. That’s [00:05:20] unlikely though, isn’t it? Don’t you think?
[00:05:21] Cameron Reilly: Look, I don’t think China wants a war. And I say this to
[00:05:24] Tony Kynaston: No.
[00:05:25] Cameron Reilly: who says, oh, China’s gonna invade, uh, Taiwan. I’m like, China doesn’t need to invade [00:05:30] Taiwan. China just needs to sit there and Taiwan will come begging eventually the way that things are going. I mean, every country in the world’s gonna is already [00:05:40] part of China’s economic orbit and is gonna increasingly become in entwined in China’s economic orbit as America spirals outta control. [00:05:50] Um, and the Chinese are nothing if not patient. But, um, yeah, I don’t think they want to go to war, but I think they’re at a point [00:06:00] where they’re ready to assert their rights to open trading with whoever they want to trade with.
[00:06:07] Tony Kynaston: Mm-hmm.
[00:06:07] Cameron Reilly: I don’t think they’re gonna [00:06:10] let Trump get in the way of them getting their oil.
[00:06:12] Tony Kynaston: I think a more likely scenario, and I’m not disagreeing with your logic there, although I think it’s a, a small chance of, of, um, [00:06:20] conflict in the Straits of Ur. Another possibility is that China blocks the South China Sea and so it’s tip for tat.
[00:06:28] Cameron Reilly: or helps the Houthis [00:06:30] block the Red Sea,
[00:06:30] Tony Kynaston: Yeah.
[00:06:31] Cameron Reilly: which is probably coming. But I’ll tell you, I was reading this, uh, last night. According to the International Energy Agency, China accounts for over [00:06:40] 70% of global EV manufacturing
[00:06:42] Tony Kynaston: Mm-hmm.
[00:06:43] Cameron Reilly: 85% of battery cell production.
[00:06:47] Tony Kynaston: Mm-hmm.
[00:06:48] Cameron Reilly: So when you’ve [00:06:50] got a world that’s suffering from an oil crisis, country that controls
[00:06:54] Tony Kynaston: I know.
[00:06:55] Cameron Reilly: majority of electronic
[00:06:56] Tony Kynaston: Do they actually have a, do they actually have an incentive to [00:07:00] open the RAI for
[00:07:01] Cameron Reilly: well, they’ve obviously been working towards energy independence
[00:07:06] Tony Kynaston: Yeah.
[00:07:07] Cameron Reilly: now, and, um, this is [00:07:10] just playing right into their hands in
[00:07:12] Tony Kynaston: Mm-hmm. Yep. Yeah, and, and I think it’s fair to say that, uh, some people don’t wanna buy Chinese [00:07:20] EVs in case, uh, there’s some kind of kill switch put in there by the CCP or data gathered by the CCP. But eventually, [00:07:30] if you can’t drive your petrol car, you’re gonna buy an ev. If you’re gonna buy an ev, you’re probably gonna buy a Chinese one.
[00:07:34] Tony Kynaston: So yeah,
[00:07:36] Cameron Reilly: Hey, do you know what this [00:07:40] is
[00:07:40] Tony Kynaston: that’s pretty hard to make out. Is it a feather or a, a seed? Is it a seed of some kind? Seed pod,
[00:07:49] Cameron Reilly: not [00:07:50] watching our YouTube. Um, it’s a mango, a Mabb, sorry. Mango mangrove seed pod.
[00:07:55] Tony Kynaston: Yeah. Okay.
[00:07:56] Cameron Reilly: I became obsessed with these in Bundaberg ’cause they’re [00:08:00] everywhere in Bundaberg. A lot of mangroves around Bundaberg. And we would, we were down at Elliot heads at low tide almost every afternoon. ’cause Fox wanted to [00:08:10] chase soldier crabs around, put them in, put them in a bucket, and then, you know, like. Try and stop them from climbing out. Um, and these are everywhere. And they’re [00:08:20] in, in shallow water. They’re standing upright
[00:08:22] Tony Kynaston: Mm-hmm.
[00:08:23] Cameron Reilly: they, and, and they have roots from this bottom that, that
[00:08:27] Tony Kynaston: Yep.
[00:08:28] Cameron Reilly: sand. And I was like, they’re [00:08:30] floating on the water and, and how do they end up upright? And so I picked one up and I threw it in the water. it does this
[00:08:37] Tony Kynaston: Yeah. Right.
[00:08:38] Cameron Reilly: it in the
[00:08:38] Tony Kynaston: It writes itself. [00:08:40] Yeah.
[00:08:40] Cameron Reilly: Yeah. They are biologically engineered. Engineered. My mother said, it’s all designed. I’m like, yes. By billion years of evolution, [00:08:50] I,
[00:08:51] Tony Kynaston: Isn’t Donald Trump a kind of counter argument to intelligent design?
[00:08:57] Cameron Reilly: so they, [00:09:00] yeah, they, they are heavier on one end, so they just, they, they themselves in the water sink. To the bottom [00:09:10] and roots just grow. And then you’ve got a mangrove tree. And I was like, that is so cool.
[00:09:17] Tony Kynaston: It is, isn’t it?
[00:09:18] Cameron Reilly: they get washed along by the [00:09:20] ocean and because they spread for hundreds and hundreds of kilometers apparently on the ocean, then when they get into shallow water, they just go [00:09:30] and insert themselves. It just, ugh. I, I dunno why. I just got such, such a thrill out watching
[00:09:36] Tony Kynaston: You,
[00:09:37] Cameron Reilly: discovering that when I
[00:09:38] Tony Kynaston: you,
[00:09:39] Cameron Reilly: the water,
[00:09:39] Tony Kynaston: [00:09:40] you once tried to tell me you had a DHD and now I’m seeing symptoms of it. ’cause how did we get from Oh, trunk to mangrove seeds?
[00:09:48] Cameron Reilly: it’s sitting on my desk. I picked [00:09:50] it up. I like this. I’ve got this, I got a little piece of that
[00:09:55] Tony Kynaston: Hi.
[00:09:55] Cameron Reilly: up on my last hike with Chrissy that I have on my desk.
[00:09:58] Tony Kynaston: Mm-hmm.
[00:09:59] Cameron Reilly: my [00:10:00] cowry shell that I picked
[00:10:01] Tony Kynaston: Oh, that’s beautiful. Yep.
[00:10:02] Cameron Reilly: um, Elliot heads,
[00:10:03] Tony Kynaston: Mm-hmm.
[00:10:04] Cameron Reilly: year. It’s my, it’s my sort of Bundaberg collection. [00:10:10] RIP Asher Bosley. Tony, do you, uh, were you saddened by the news yesterday of the death at 92 of Asher Bosley?
[00:10:17] Tony Kynaston: Well, I, I wasn’t, because I dunno who that person [00:10:20] is.
[00:10:20] Cameron Reilly: She was one. She and her sister Lata were the, the two queens of Bollywood, uh, [00:10:30] vocals, pretty
[00:10:31] Tony Kynaston: How come, how come? None of this is in the meeting notes you sent through in the morning.
[00:10:36] Cameron Reilly: I like to keep you on your toes.
[00:10:38] Tony Kynaston: Yeah. Thanks.
[00:10:39] Cameron Reilly: [00:10:40] Um, he, she and her sister Lata had these, like, really weird, very, very high. Um, met, met [00:10:50] voices every Bollywood romcom since, I don’t know, the eighties, seventies and eighties. They sang the female leads [00:11:00] up until they were in their eighties. Um, there would be a girl on, on camera, like, um, KA in 1995, DDLJ with Gerald Khan, who’s like [00:11:10] 23, 24, absolutely gorgeous. And you have an 80-year-old woman singing the female vocals of all of her numbers. Um, and she passed away, but [00:11:20] an, an insane contribution to Hindi cinema in the last 40 years. Uh, Asha and her sister. So
[00:11:28] Tony Kynaston: Hey, up.
[00:11:28] Cameron Reilly: fans out there, [00:11:30] join with
[00:11:32] Tony Kynaston: well, for all the Bowood fans out there, go to a restaurant called Daughter-in-Law. There’s, there’s a couple in Melbourne. We went to one in South [00:11:40] Yarra on Chapel Street a couple of weeks ago. And, um, it is just 3D Bollywood. It’s fantastic.
[00:11:47] Cameron Reilly: Oh
[00:11:47] Tony Kynaston: Really. I’ll send you some photos later. It’s really, [00:11:50] really colorful.
[00:11:51] Tony Kynaston: Um, if they have, if you have a birthday, they bring over a turban and put it on your head and sing you a song. Yeah. And it’s um, it looks so [00:12:00] brightly colored. It’s amazing. It’s fantastic. Food’s good.
[00:12:03] Cameron Reilly: Next time I come down, we’ll have
[00:12:05] Tony Kynaston: Hmm.
[00:12:06] Cameron Reilly: Alright, well let’s get onto investing. Um, [00:12:10] it’s been
[00:12:11] Tony Kynaston: You’ve been trying to avoid it.
[00:12:12] Cameron Reilly: I know it’s been a surprisingly good week though, um,
[00:12:16] Tony Kynaston: Yeah.
[00:12:17] Cameron Reilly: for some crazy [00:12:20] reason.
[00:12:20] Tony Kynaston: It is amazing how the market’s ignoring all the stuff, isn’t it? We’re getting close to highs again.
[00:12:25] Cameron Reilly: It drops and then it just comes back a
[00:12:28] Tony Kynaston: Hmm.
[00:12:28] Cameron Reilly: and it’s like, ah, [00:12:30] you know, how bad could it be?
[00:12:32] Tony Kynaston: But it’s not just shrugging off Donald Trump and the Middle East conflicts, it’s shrugging off higher interest rates and, and, [00:12:40] you know, higher inflation going forward too, which is very surprising.
[00:12:43] Cameron Reilly: Higher interest rates, like supply difficulties, not
[00:12:47] Tony Kynaston: Mm-hmm.
[00:12:48] Cameron Reilly: products, but with [00:12:50] fertilizer.
[00:12:50] Tony Kynaston: Yeah.
[00:12:51] Cameron Reilly: economist, every political leader around the world says, yeah, we’re, this is gonna be really, really bad. Gird your loins the market’s [00:13:00] like, nah, it’ll be great.
[00:13:02] Tony Kynaston: Winning.
[00:13:03] Cameron Reilly: We’re all, The, the all odd, the top of the all odds was in, on the [00:13:10] 23rd of February, 2026, uh, at, uh, 9, 4, 3 5. We’re [00:13:20] currently at 9 1 7 4, so it’s as high as it has been. Like the only time it’s been above that. I think it got above that in [00:13:30] August last year. It’s sort of been hovering around the 9 2, 9 3 level since then. So yeah, almost record highs. Um. [00:13:40] just, I don’t
[00:13:41] Tony Kynaston: It’s hard to explain, isn’t it? Yeah, I agree.
[00:13:43] Cameron Reilly: I don’t know, you know, what’s going on.
[00:13:45] Cameron Reilly: You’re a smart, but to me, I just look at it. Go, this is bonkers. Anyway,
[00:13:48] Tony Kynaston: it does to me [00:13:50] too.
[00:13:50] Cameron Reilly: let’s talk about, uh, portfolio performance. While we are here, the dummy portfolio, financial year to date is [00:14:00] up 19% versus the, uh, index up So we’re doing two and a half [00:14:10] times, uh, for this financial year. Um, since inception, um, we’re up 15 [00:14:20] versus nine. Um, so not quite double market. And that’s not actually fully inception. That’s from March, not from September. If I went from September, it’d be a little bit different, [00:14:30] but I can’t be bothered. I’ll do five years, um, to make it round numbers. years we’re up 16% versus nine. That’s pretty much
[00:14:38] Tony Kynaston: Hmm.
[00:14:39] Cameron Reilly: So there you go. [00:14:40] Um, the light portfolio group, different perspective. Uh, this financial year [00:14:50] up, 27% versus eight for the index and all time for the light portfolio. [00:15:00] Up 19% versus 1119 point a half versus 10.8 really. So double market, um, for the light [00:15:10] portfolios. And that’s the four portfolios combined, which together have not quite 80 stocks, probably somewhere between 60 and 80 stocks. [00:15:20] Um.
[00:15:20] Tony Kynaston: I find that amazing to have a large portfolio doing that and that kind of gives me, you know, it’s something I’ve never really tried to do. So it’s, um, a new [00:15:30] learning for me that you can have a large portfolio and still go out performance.
[00:15:33] Cameron Reilly: And the first portfolio that I set up, the one that started in February, 2022, just as everything went to [00:15:40] shit is still underwater. It’s, um, 7.2% per annum over that period of
[00:15:46] Tony Kynaston: I right.
[00:15:48] Cameron Reilly: [00:15:50] 9.32% for the s uh, the SPDR. It was, it did catch up at one stage, but it’s fallen again, uh, in the last month or so. So the [00:16:00] rest have to make up for that.
[00:16:01] Cameron Reilly: Um,
[00:16:02] Tony Kynaston: Yeah.
[00:16:02] Cameron Reilly: portfolio is up 15 versus nine. third portfolio is up [00:16:10] 23 versus 11. And the
[00:16:14] Tony Kynaston: Hmm.
[00:16:14] Cameron Reilly: portfolio, which started in November [00:16:20] 22, is up 23 versus 11. So, uh, yeah, I mean if you took out that first one, those other three are [00:16:30] really doing quite well. But there
[00:16:31] Tony Kynaston: Yeah, but you can’t, that’s a, that’s a learning in itself too, is a, um, well, like, they call it dollar cost averaging, but don’t put all your eggs in the basket on day [00:16:40] one. Um. Start. Start to build a portfolio a little bit over time and try and spread the risk of it being the worst time to start investing.
[00:16:49] Cameron Reilly: [00:16:50] Well, I would’ve added like one or two stocks a week back then, so it would’ve taken me a few months to build up, but I. Yeah, I mean, so if anyone followed that [00:17:00] portfolio exactly, they’re up, but they’re underperforming the index. Um, if it was an exact copy, but yeah. Anyway, it’s timing, like [00:17:10] exactly the same strategy for all four portfolios and the W portfolio and you know, it was just a like at one point in by EP, [00:17:20] by, sorry, June, 2023, the light that the first light portfolio was down 10% and the index was up five, so we were under
[00:17:28] Tony Kynaston: Mm.
[00:17:29] Cameron Reilly: by [00:17:30] 15% at one stage. We’ve caught back up since then, so that’s not too bad, but yeah, it was a bad start. Anyway, there you go. That’s my portfolio [00:17:40] updates. Everything’s looking good. Let’s get into some news Q, rejected Horizon’s offer. Tony, they put out a thing with a just big no [00:17:50] Says no.
[00:17:53] Tony Kynaston: Every time I hear QI think bring it back. Bring it back safely, James.
[00:17:59] Cameron Reilly: [00:18:00] The independent board committee unanimously recommends that you reject the offer from Horizon to reject the offer. Simply take no action. [00:18:10] So they consider that the offer is inadequate. The timing of the offer offer is opportunistic, coinciding with Horizon shares trading [00:18:20] at a 10 year high. That’d be, I mean, it’d be a bit of a shame if the offer was an offer.
[00:18:25] Cameron Reilly: Wasn’t opportunistic.
[00:18:26] Tony Kynaston: Yeah. For Horizon shareholders. Yeah,
[00:18:28] Cameron Reilly: Yeah. Isn’t that [00:18:30] why you do things? ’cause it’s
[00:18:31] Tony Kynaston: correct.
[00:18:32] Cameron Reilly: Everything we buy, we buy because it’s opportunistic, right? We
[00:18:36] Tony Kynaston: Right.
[00:18:36] Cameron Reilly: cheap. We’ll buy it. Uh, based on objective [00:18:40] comparative measures, the offer appears to undervalue Q Relative to Horizon Q.
[00:18:45] Cameron Reilly: Shareholders who accept the offer would suffer significant dilution of their exposure to [00:18:50] Q’s key assets. Potential synergies are likely understated by horizon and the offer ascribes minimal value to them, and it goes on. Did you have any [00:19:00] thoughts on, uh, the rejection.
[00:19:01] Tony Kynaston: Uh, I have I, not so much on the rejection, but what to do in this situation. So it’s Q, which is CUE energy, um, [00:19:10] is on the buy list. Horizon. Well, I think it’s still on the buy list last time I looked. Uh, but we put a, I think we put a hold on, um, buying Q because it was under [00:19:20] takeover. So the question in my mind is, do we take that hold off now because, um, they’ve rejected the horizon offer?
[00:19:27] Tony Kynaston: Or do we still say it’s a takeover situation? [00:19:30] Um, ’cause takeover situations have additional upside and additional risk. It’s, it’s possible. Q are playing a. A savvy game and they’re [00:19:40] forcing Horizon to come back with a higher offer. But it’s also possible that Horizon walks away and says they can’t increase their offer.
[00:19:47] Tony Kynaston: In which case, if there’s any, um, [00:19:50] takeover premium built into the queue share price, it’ll withdraw a little bit. I, I’m tempted to say, if anyone, if, if I was looking to buy a stock and Q was the next thing to [00:20:00] buy, I probably would buy it in this situation. ’cause it’s, um, benefit benefiting from the high or price and it’s on the buy list and it looks good from a QAV perspective, but there [00:20:10] is just a sad risk that who knows what’s gonna happen with the takeover.
[00:20:13] Cameron Reilly: Okay, so you think I should, uh, take that note off of Q
[00:20:19] Tony Kynaston: [00:20:20] I think so. Look, I don’t really have much experience in this situation. Um, I can’t think of a takeover for a stock that’s on the buy list that’s gone through [00:20:30] a, um, a complete rejection. Normally, I think in. The majority of cases I can think of, the board tries to get the suited to up their [00:20:40] offer, but it does so by engaging.
[00:20:41] Tony Kynaston: And they might go through a period of due diligence or they might say, you know, the board accepts the offer or recommends acceptance in the absence of a higher offer. That [00:20:50] kind of thing.
[00:20:50] Cameron Reilly: hmm.
[00:20:51] Tony Kynaston: yes, I can’t think of a case for a long time for a stock on the buy list anyway, where they’ve said, reject the offer and do [00:21:00] nothing.
[00:21:00] Cameron Reilly: Well, for what it’s worth wasn’t actually on my buy list this week.
[00:21:05] Tony Kynaston: Okay.
[00:21:06] Cameron Reilly: and I’m trying to figure out why not. Uh, [00:21:10] QAV score 0.068.
[00:21:13] Tony Kynaston: Mm.
[00:21:13] Cameron Reilly: missed the cutoff quality score. 36.4. Whoa. [00:21:20] So, you know,
[00:21:20] Tony Kynaston: Okay.
[00:21:21] Cameron Reilly: long way from our buy list at the moment.
[00:21:23] Tony Kynaston: Okay. Sorry about that. It was on the buy list recently?
[00:21:25] Cameron Reilly: Yeah. where it fell off.
[00:21:28] Tony Kynaston: Yeah. Okay. Well, it doesn’t, doesn’t matter [00:21:30] then, but yeah. I’m tempted to take, take the hold off until something develops.
[00:21:34] Cameron Reilly: yeah. At the end of March. It was on our buy list all through March and February. [00:21:40] So is the share price gone up?
[00:21:44] Tony Kynaston: it has.
[00:21:46] Cameron Reilly: Oh yeah. Yeah. It has. [00:21:50] It jumped from 11 cents in February to 16 cents, uh, 15 now. So yeah, I think that, [00:22:00] uh, put the Kosh on it from a buy list perspective by the looks of it. Okay, well I’ll take that note off, but it probably won’t be on the buy [00:22:10] list for a bit anyway, unless the price comes back down. BOQ announces capital partnership with Challenger. This is on the [00:22:20] 7th of April. Bank of Queensland today announces a strategic capital partnership with Challenger Limited Marking a further step in its transformation to a simpler [00:22:30] specialist bank. The partnership with Challenger includes a whole of loan sale and a forward flow arrangement for equipment finance assets that will further [00:22:40] optimize Bo Q’s funding base and support the acceleration of the group’s ambition to service more equipment finance customers, particularly in [00:22:50] the small to medium business sector. I understand pretty much none of those words, so, uh.
[00:22:58] Tony Kynaston: He’s a bit of a word salad, [00:23:00] but, um,
[00:23:00] Cameron Reilly: Yeah.
[00:23:01] Tony Kynaston: it’s interesting from two points of view. ’cause Challenger was trying to do this with I think Pepper money, which was on the buy list for a while. They were trying to take it over in partnership with [00:23:10] KKR to, um, to be the funder of the loan book for equipment loans for pepper money.
[00:23:17] Tony Kynaston: And that, um, fell over. And [00:23:20] so very quickly they’ve done a similar deal with bank at Queensland. It, it, it’s interesting from the, for a second point of view because of what’s happening in the banking and insurance [00:23:30] industries and it’s kind of this arbitrage between regulations and, and I dunno a whole heap about it, but I’ll, I’ll try and summarize it.
[00:23:37] Tony Kynaston: So banks are regulated by a PR [00:23:40] and they have to hold certain. Capital. Well, there’s certain rules around lending to, to people so that they, um, remain robust. Um. [00:23:50] Insurance companies have a different set of regulations. I’m not sure if they’re also covered by a or by somebody else. And those regulations are around what they [00:24:00] do with their float, which is, we would’ve talked about that with Berkshire Hathaway in mind.
[00:24:05] Tony Kynaston: Warren Buffett made a lot of money out of taking the float, which [00:24:10] is the difference between the premiums and the claims. Um, so all that money slashes around inside an insurance company and needs to be invested, um, and then needs to be able [00:24:20] to be pulled out again and, and used for claims payments in the future.
[00:24:25] Tony Kynaston: So, um, challenger, it’s not, whilst it’s not an insurance company and we [00:24:30] did a, I did the pulled pork on them recently. They’re, they kind of have attributes of an insurance company, so they’re providing annuities. And so an insurance company, you pay them [00:24:40] premiums and if you die, suddenly you get a payout.
[00:24:43] Tony Kynaston: This is the reverse with challenges. So they, you, you give ’em the lump sum at, at the [00:24:50] front, and then they give you the dividends, like the premiums, um, every year on a fixed basis. And when you die that ceases or, or whatever the fixed term is. You’ve agreed with [00:25:00] challenger, but that’s kind of like insurance in reverse.
[00:25:03] Tony Kynaston: And I, I think it’s covered by the insurance, um, rules around float. But there will certainly be rules on [00:25:10] Challenger about what it needs to invest in to make sure it can continue to pay annuities that it’s, um, contracted to do. There’s a, there’s an arbitrage between the bank rules on [00:25:20] lending to people on and borrowing to do that and the insurance rules, which means that, uh, someone like the Bank of Queensland can go to Challenger and say, [00:25:30] Hey.
[00:25:30] Tony Kynaston: Um, say the interest rate at the moment, you can get in the market’s 4%, we’ll give you five, um, and then we’ll lend it out to our customers at [00:25:40] seven and we’ll make the same margin we would’ve made if we were having to put bonds into the market or take deposits and then, um, and then use that money to, to, um, lend [00:25:50] to our customers.
[00:25:50] Tony Kynaston: So it’s just a, a different funding model for the Bank of Queensland, but it’s, it’s happening around the world in more and more places. And I know it’s a, it’s becoming a [00:26:00] big deal in America, just, just whether this sort of arbitrage is the, the right use of the rules, whether it’s gonna lead to problems down the track, or whether it’s completely okay.
[00:26:09] Tony Kynaston: But you’ve got [00:26:10] the, essentially the same thing going on by two different types of companies and the two different types of regulations. Um, and that’s what Bank of Queensland and Challenger are using to their [00:26:20] advantage at the moment.
[00:26:21] Cameron Reilly: Right. So does it have any impact on us from a QAV perspective?
[00:26:28] Tony Kynaston: I don’t think so. No. It may [00:26:30] improve the QAV score for Bank of Queensland, um, because, uh, they’ll, they possibly have better margins under this arrangement, um, on, at least on [00:26:40] that lending book part of it. But I know, I know the share price went up when it was announced, so the market likes it going forward as well.
[00:26:47] Cameron Reilly: Well, I [00:26:50] dunno if the share price went up that much. If you look at it over the last three months, the share price, are you talking about BOQ or challenger?
[00:26:58] Tony Kynaston: BOQ?
[00:26:59] Cameron Reilly: Oh, [00:27:00] BOQ. Yeah.
[00:27:00] Tony Kynaston: Yeah.
[00:27:01] Cameron Reilly: It did jump. Yeah. Okay. And I think we hold BOQ in some portfolios. Where’s
[00:27:09] Tony Kynaston: [00:27:10] think though, like if you are a, if you’re a government regulator, if you’re a a and you see a bank and you say you’ve got all these capital ratios to make sure that there’s not gonna be a, um, a role on the bank [00:27:20] and it can survive if there is and all this kind of thing. Um, but you’re sort of getting around those by outsourcing that risk to insurance company, which has lacks of rules, whether that’s a good [00:27:30] thing or not.
[00:27:30] Tony Kynaston: So
[00:27:31] Cameron Reilly: Hmm.
[00:27:31] Tony Kynaston: it’s potentially, it won’t happen quickly, but potentially there might be a re juggling of the rules to, to account for this, [00:27:40] but it’s an opportunity at the moment, especially for the smaller banks like, um, uh, Bendigo, um, bank of Queensland, et cetera, which have [00:27:50] had more onerous conditions put on them by a PR because APRA sees them as being a higher risk of, of failing than the bigger banks.
[00:27:57] Cameron Reilly: Yeah.
[00:27:58] Tony Kynaston: Mm.
[00:27:59] Cameron Reilly: [00:28:00] We don’t hold BOQ or Challenger in any of the QAV portfolios, so there you go.
[00:28:06] Tony Kynaston: I should declare, I think, uh, my wife owns some BOQ shares still [00:28:10] from when she was on their board years ago.
[00:28:12] Cameron Reilly: Well, we’ve got a couple of C‑level resignations to cover briefly. Tony one is fairly innocuous, I think [00:28:20] Select Harvests. The Armand company you did a Paul Pork on
[00:28:24] Tony Kynaston: Mm-hmm.
[00:28:25] Cameron Reilly: their Chief Executive Officer, David Surveyor. [00:28:30] Announced on the 9th of April that he was gonna resign. And, uh, I think that’s a nice, uh, transition.
[00:28:38] Cameron Reilly: He will remain with the [00:28:40] company to work through his six month notice period and assist with an orderly transition. So nothing to see here. Um, let’s see how the share [00:28:50] price reacted to that news. Uh, it dipped. Oh, that, that warms the heart, doesn’t it? Eh, good [00:29:00] luck. Yeah, well done. Mr. Surveyor. People are sad that you’re leaving, obviously a safe pair of hands.
[00:29:05] Cameron Reilly: On the other hand, Terra Comm, [00:29:10] I picked up yesterday that the Chief Financial Officer, Ms. Jen Williams, who’d only been with the company, uh, only been in the position anyway since the 7th of [00:29:20] August, had resigned effective immediately. And then I noticed that the day before that the managing director, Mr.
[00:29:26] Cameron Reilly: Danny McCarthy also. Resigned [00:29:30] to conclude on the 30th of April, 2026,
[00:29:35] Tony Kynaston: Which is very short notice.
[00:29:37] Cameron Reilly: Well, it says he steps down from his role as [00:29:40] MD immediately
[00:29:41] Tony Kynaston: Hmm.
[00:29:41] Cameron Reilly: and will ensure a orderly handover through to the 30th of April. There. Financial report came out on the 27th of [00:29:50] February, so, you know, it was like a month later, both left. Uh, what do you, what do you read in that?
[00:29:59] Tony Kynaston: It, it is [00:30:00] hard to know ’cause it’s a small company. It’s not much coverage, but it doesn’t look good. CEO and CFO resigning. Um, and sort of, it would seem unexpectedly ’cause [00:30:10] it’s immediate and they, he’s only hanging, they MD’s only hanging around until the 30th of April. Even though it says to help an oddly take, uh, handover like that, [00:30:20] if that will happen, um, they’re probably gonna have to start looking for a CEO to replace him.
[00:30:25] Tony Kynaston: It’ll take a lot longer than that unless there’s someone trained up in the wings. But again, I don’t [00:30:30] know much about the company and much about these people. Um, one potential reason is that they’re going to a competitor. [00:30:40] Um, and, and sometimes, uh, you know, like a CFO will be loyal to the CEO, so she’s going to, um, but yeah, I’m reading a [00:30:50] lot into the teas here, but on the, on the surface of it, it doesn’t look good.
[00:30:53] Cameron Reilly: No, it looks a little bit salacious. Um. Yeah, well, [00:31:00] they’re, uh, Brisbane based. Uh, so I’ll, I’ll, you know, I’m so connected to the, uh, Bri, the Brisbane, uh,
[00:31:09] Tony Kynaston: Yeah,
[00:31:09] Cameron Reilly: [00:31:10] and resources community. I’ll, I’ll, uh, put my ear to the ground, see what’s, see what’s happening.
[00:31:15] Tony Kynaston: hang around the Eagle, Eagle Street, and the, what’s the restaurant [00:31:20] down there? Pier One, I think it was. Yeah.
[00:31:22] Cameron Reilly: yeah, yeah, yeah. I’ll find out what’s going on.
[00:31:24] Cameron Reilly: Don’t you worry. Um, do we own TER? Let me [00:31:30] see. Are they on the buy list? Don’t think they’re on the
[00:31:32] Tony Kynaston: No,
[00:31:32] Cameron Reilly: list.
[00:31:32] Tony Kynaston: a long time. Didn’t go on there years ago.
[00:31:35] Cameron Reilly: Right. Let me see if I hold them. TER? [00:31:40] No, no TER either inconsequential. These are to
[00:31:47] Tony Kynaston: Mm-hmm.
[00:31:48] Cameron Reilly: What else have I [00:31:50] got? Uh, an sent me an email I got today. Hi Kim. I noticed last week that both EDU and RRL on your latest spreadsheet didn’t show a dividend and Stock Doctor even though [00:32:00] they were clearly paying dividends. sent an email through to Stock Doctor and they got back to me. Today, their morning staff feed is the issue and it’s now been discovered that it is an issue for [00:32:10] 100 or more dividend paying stocks.
[00:32:13] Tony Kynaston: Wow.
[00:32:14] Cameron Reilly: uses the same feed and they don’t have the dividends listed correctly either. I’ve been advised [00:32:20] Stock Doctor have now manually processed the dividends onto their platform for EDU and RRL for the last half, but until the issue is fixed, it might be something to watch. [00:32:30] Cheers. Ang Well that’s a great pickup,
[00:32:33] Tony Kynaston: It is well done.
[00:32:35] Cameron Reilly: That’s a big issue for me because the first thing I check if something breaches [00:32:40] a sell line is the dividends in
[00:32:42] Tony Kynaston: Mm.
[00:32:42] Cameron Reilly: Doctor to see if I need to factor in a something
[00:32:45] Tony Kynaston: Yeah.
[00:32:45] Cameron Reilly: diviv. And if they’re not reporting it,
[00:32:47] Tony Kynaston: Yeah. Wow.
[00:32:49] Cameron Reilly: could be selling stuff [00:32:50] I didn’t need to sell.
[00:32:50] Cameron Reilly: Fortunately I haven’t had to sell much stuff for LA uh, uh, lately, so I don’t think it’s been a, an issue. But, um, yeah, good pickup an so I [00:33:00] dunno what we do about that, I guess. Yeah, you’re gonna sell something, maybe check their annual report [00:33:10] for dividends or something before you press the button.
[00:33:13] Tony Kynaston: Yeah. Yeah. But well, well, there should be a dividend announcement. You can search as well. Check for [00:33:20] that.
[00:33:20] Cameron Reilly: Oh, Stock Doctor may have those. Just not have it in the financials, you think?
[00:33:25] Tony Kynaston: Yeah.
[00:33:26] Cameron Reilly: Right. Okay. [00:33:30] So check the announcements page. I’m looking for dividend dividend announcements in [00:33:40] RRL hmm. Dividend distribution 19th of February. Yeah. Okay. [00:33:50] Good. Good. Thank you Ang for bringing that to our attention. What have you got, TK, on your list of
[00:33:56] Tony Kynaston: Well, speaking of EDUI was going to, um, mention that they’ve [00:34:00] become a star stock in Stock Doctor, and I think they’re back on the B list. Um, last week and this week, I think from memory.
[00:34:08] Cameron Reilly: They were.
[00:34:09] Tony Kynaston: Yeah. [00:34:10] So I thought, um, our friend who’s been on the show Key and Rin did a good analysis. This is back on 7th of April when they [00:34:20] became a star growth and star income stock.
[00:34:24] Tony Kynaston: And, um, he says, following our analysis of EDU holdings, we initiate coverage on the [00:34:30] tertiary education provider as both a star growth and star income stock. So I’ve done a pulled pork on EDU, um, from last year, I think, so [00:34:40] people can look that up in the podcast list. But, uh, Kien goes on to say, EDU provides tertiary education through two divisions, icon Institute.
[00:34:49] Tony Kynaston: [00:34:50] IKON, which does higher education degrees such as counseling and teaching, and Australian Learning Group, which is a vocational trainer. The business has [00:35:00] deliberately shifted towards higher education, which now contributes 80% of revenue. This is important because higher education courses run for longer, generate higher fees per [00:35:10] student, and provide more predictable income streams.
[00:35:13] Tony Kynaston: The company is led by founder and CEO Adam Davis, who retains a meaningful equity stake, ensuring [00:35:20] a strong alignment with shareholder interests. Goes on to say that the. FY 25 results were what, um, triggered this, uh, uh, [00:35:30] in, uh, EDU becoming a star growth stock. It says FY 25 marked a significant step up in performance.
[00:35:37] Tony Kynaston: Revenue increased 95%. Net [00:35:40] profit rose to 14.8 million from 2.6 million, and, uh, profitability improved sharply with net profit margins increasing to 18% [00:35:50] from 5.6%. Return on equity is now 85% from 21% the prior year, reflecting strong enrollment growth in operating [00:36:00] leverage. Importantly, the company paid a 3 cents fully franked final dividend, taking the full year dividend of 4 cents, a equating to a gross dividend yield of [00:36:10] 7.5%.
[00:36:11] Tony Kynaston: The dividend appears sustainable, supported by a modest payout ratio of 30% and strong free cash flow generation comfortably exceeding [00:36:20] distributions. Meanwhile, the balance sheet remains strong with EDU, ending the year debt free and holding $18.5 million in cash, et cetera, et cetera. [00:36:30] They spoke about the um, dividend there.
[00:36:33] Tony Kynaston: They should have picked it up themselves, I guess, shouldn’t they?
[00:36:35] Cameron Reilly: You would think
[00:36:37] Tony Kynaston: Yeah. [00:36:40] Yeah. So that’s EDU, and it seems like they’ve had a good result and they’re back on our buy list as well.
[00:36:45] Cameron Reilly: they are. I couldn’t buy them. I think I went to buy them [00:36:50] yesterday, but they were down. Everything was down yesterday when, when I went to try and buy stuff. But I managed to buy something today, and I think coincidentally, it’s the company you’re doing a [00:37:00] pulled pork on.
[00:37:00] Tony Kynaston: Oh, you go. You got ahead of it.
[00:37:02] Cameron Reilly: Yeah, I do have two. We do hold EDU in two portfolios though, um, added it to one of the light [00:37:10] portfolios in September last year.
[00:37:11] Cameron Reilly: It’s up 53% since then, but then I added it to the dummy portfolio on the 8th of April. It [00:37:20] was a week ago. It’s down 3% since then. But, uh, doing well in the dummy in the light portfolio, 53%
[00:37:28] Tony Kynaston: run.
[00:37:29] Cameron Reilly: six [00:37:30] months. It’s
[00:37:30] Tony Kynaston: Mm, pretty good. So I’m doing a pulled pork on Pete PPC is the code
[00:37:38] Cameron Reilly: yeah.
[00:37:39] Tony Kynaston: and that’s [00:37:40] following a request from, uh. Bye, Dave from Youi. So thanks Dave. Uh, it’s a little way down the buy list, but it’s a, it’s a buy at the moment, so it’s worth [00:37:50] talking about. So who are Pete? They’re a Perth based property developer.
[00:37:56] Tony Kynaston: Um, and again, I think I said last week that we’re [00:38:00] starting to see a bit of a theme emerge. Uh, a couple of, uh, other property developers, Finbar and Fleetwood, both, um, pulled porks [00:38:10] from, um, recent times. They’re, they have been on the buy list, so I don’t think either of them are at the moment. Finbar may have come back.
[00:38:16] Tony Kynaston: Finbar is based in Perth, as is Pete, and Fleetwood I think [00:38:20] is based in Sydney. Uh, so peak operate nationally, but they do derive a lot of revenue from Western Australia. And as I [00:38:30] said, when I did the Finbar pulled Pork Western Australia’s going through a, uh, boom time at the moment with, um, lots of jobs because of the, um, resource industry [00:38:40] and lots of population migration to those jobs.
[00:38:43] Tony Kynaston: Uh, and it’s, it’s doing very well. State governments, um. Cashed up and, uh, it’s [00:38:50] a, it seems to be a pretty good place to live, attracting lots of people. Pete’s an interesting company. It was formed 130 years ago, back in 1895, [00:39:00] and it makes it one of the oldest companies, one of, certainly one of the oldest property companies in Australia.
[00:39:05] Tony Kynaston: It was founded by James Thomas, Pete in 1895, [00:39:10] English born surveyor and draftsman. He moved to Perth during the gold brush era when the city was expanded, expanding rapidly, and he was [00:39:20] instrumental in subdividing much of what we now know as Perth, um, especially in the metropolitan areas. And he, for people who live over there, he worked on earlier estate in places like [00:39:30] Kaunda, bury Hill, and High Ham, or High Wickham.
[00:39:35] Tony Kynaston: I’m not familiar with Perth. I forgive my pronunciation. One of the, [00:39:40] um, one of the big things to note about. Pete is its history as being a syndicator. Uh, and it’s really pioneered retail land [00:39:50] syndication in Australia. And what that means is that, uh, they allow investors to, uh, pool their money to buy and develop, develop large tracks of [00:40:00] land, and, uh, essentially via either a company or a trust type of structure, which Pete manages, um, does the work [00:40:10] and then pays out, uh, the results after taking fees.
[00:40:13] Tony Kynaston: And the benefit of that is it’s a capital light structure. So Pete aren’t having to go and, uh, raise money [00:40:20] and then do the subdivision and take the risk on their own balance sheet. They’re actually doing it in an arm’s length and taking the fees involved in doing that. Um, [00:40:30] I guess, uh. To, to look a bit more back at their history.
[00:40:36] Tony Kynaston: Um, after James Pete passed away in 1930 [00:40:40] fives, his son Cyril, earnest Pete took the reigns and he successfully steered the company through the Great Depression and World War ii, which in no mean [00:40:50] feat and under his leadership, the firm moved beyond Simple land sales and began focus focusing more heavily on the large scale residential subdivisions that would [00:41:00] become their hallmark.
[00:41:01] Tony Kynaston: Uh, and then eventually Cyril’s son, Lindsey JP, joined the business and maintained the family legacy for, for [00:41:10] decades. Uh, well, James, Pete started the idea, it was during the mid to late 20th century that the company perfected the land syndication model and they realized instead of the [00:41:20] company taking all the risks, they could invite private investors to buy into specific land projects.
[00:41:26] Tony Kynaston: So, uh, that was pioneered. [00:41:30] And the other side of that, um. Type of structures. It allowed them to expand quite quickly because they weren’t having to go and, um, raise money [00:41:40] against collateral and then take the risk and then wait many years for the development cycle to go through. They could raise money quickly, put it into a trust or a company, and then raise it [00:41:50] again and again and again if they had the right, uh, land available for development.
[00:41:54] Tony Kynaston: So it allowed ’em to grow quickly. Um, in 2004, the company, um, [00:42:00] listed on the ASX and shifted away from being a family run local agency to, uh, more of a, a corporate, um, [00:42:10] national type company. Uh.
[00:42:13] Tony Kynaston: A guy, I should just mention, a guy called Tony Lennon, who was still on the board today, joined the company [00:42:20] in the eighties and was a driving force behind its expansion and also, uh, behind its listing. Um, and sort of in the era, sort [00:42:30] of, uh, of, of his tenure, they expanded into major projects in, um, the Eastern Seaboard Victoria and Queensland in particular.
[00:42:39] Tony Kynaston: [00:42:40] Uh, I wanna, I guess to go, what can I say about ’em? What, let me, let me explain why I see [00:42:50] Pete as a bit of a different type of property developer to say a, um, another comparable residential developer like a Mirvac or a Stockland. Um. [00:43:00] The first thing to to note is that oftentimes property developers don’t just stick to residential subdivision.
[00:43:06] Tony Kynaston: They’ll do office buildings or apartment towers [00:43:10] like a, a Harry Trib in Sydney, for example. Um, but Pete. Purely focuses on residential land and residential subdivision. And they really focus in the [00:43:20] strategy is to focus in on, uh, growth corridors and to focus on the home first home buyer’s market. And they try and make that as attractive as they can [00:43:30] to these people to move into these growth corridors.
[00:43:32] Tony Kynaston: And they get a lot of support from governments who are putting in infrastructure into these growth corridors. Um, typically via, [00:43:40] uh, railway stations, for example, but they could also be via schools or hospitals, et cetera, being built in the area. So that’s their strategy, uh, which makes ’em a bit different to [00:43:50] the Stocklands and the mx.
[00:43:51] Tony Kynaston: Um, they control a massive land bank of over 40,000 lots at the moment, which means that they’ve got a whole decade of work [00:44:00] lined up already, which is another sort of, um, individual feature for this company. Uh, the, um. [00:44:10] Well, uh, might just list a couple of their developments so people can, if they know of these, um, these places, get a feel for what, uh, this company’s doing.[00:44:20]
[00:44:20] Tony Kynaston: So one of them is in Adelaide, south Australia. It’s called for Forestville. It’s a $250 million urban renewal project. Um, barely two Ks from the Adelaide CBD. [00:44:30] Um, they’ve put a thing called the Agora Hub in the middle of it. So it’s a market square with, with, uh, restaurants and cafes in the supermarket. Um, they [00:44:40] have, uh, included the provision for EV charging and battery storage is standard in the houses that are being built.
[00:44:47] Tony Kynaston: And they have [00:44:50] put, uh, what they call an urban green school into the development as well, where, where students can learn about, uh, sustainable food production and Virginia regenerative [00:45:00] a agriculture. And they do that. In a number of their planned communities, they make sure there’s plenty of parks and space, and they have even partnered with the Black Dog Institute to [00:45:10] put in, um, mental health, uh, type services, um, in the, uh, communities as well, which, so they’re trying to find additional benefits for people to choose their [00:45:20] developments over a competitor.
[00:45:21] Tony Kynaston: Another one is, um, yanchi in Perth. Uh, so it kicked off in March, 2026, and it’s a 58 hectare [00:45:30] site, uh, which was set to deliver 700 homes. And it’s specifically designed to surround the new Yanchi Train station. Train [00:45:40] station, which is, um, only recently opened. And it’s, it’s focusing on that as being the centerpiece for the, uh, community.
[00:45:46] Tony Kynaston: So I can, um, use the train to commute. [00:45:50] Uh. Few other ones. Um, golden Bay Estate and WA has a sustainability focus on Dara in Belcon. Interesting one there partnered with the University of [00:46:00] Canberra. It’s a $1.7 billion project, um, spanning up to 20 years and will eventually house over 3000 residences in a unique [00:46:10] campus living model that integrates university facilities with facilities, with residential housing.
[00:46:16] Tony Kynaston: So a number of really well thought out subdivisions going on, [00:46:20] and as I said, usually around a central hub or a train station or a university or whatever. So that’s their kind of, um, unique approach. Um, the other [00:46:30] secret source for this company is, is, of course, a syndicated model where they’re not, um, taking on balance sheet risk for these subdivisions.
[00:46:37] Tony Kynaston: And it’s a bit of a different sort of [00:46:40] model, if I can just spend a minute talking about that. Compared to, say, what people might think of as a, um, a reit, a real estate, um, investment trust, which are sometimes listed on [00:46:50] the ASX. The way that they run their, um, trusts is that, uh, they target, uh, an internal rate of return, usually between [00:47:00] 15 and 20%, and historically actually oftentimes outperforming that, um, that some, some of them have returned 23% per annum, some 25% [00:47:10] per annum.
[00:47:10] Tony Kynaston: The catch is that, uh, it’s a lumpy payback, so the money isn’t in your pocket every month the way it could be, or every quarter or every half. The way it [00:47:20] could be if it was a listed, um, real estate investment trust. So they’re not paying, um, a dividend as such. What they’re doing is they take the money from the trust and they usually [00:47:30] spend the first two or three years.
[00:47:32] Tony Kynaston: Um, providing no return and the money spent on getting approvals, subdividing the land, putting in any civil works they need to, [00:47:40] like roads or piping or power or whatever. And then they call it the harvest in years three to seven when the land lots are to sold to builders [00:47:50] or they, um, uh, build themselves and sell to end users.
[00:47:54] Tony Kynaston: And the way that the return works is that first of all. If you’re an investor in the trust you get, you get [00:48:00] paid out from the profits of these land sales, but you get your money back first. The original investment gets paid back to you first. And that’s important because once the original capital is back, any [00:48:10] subsequent payments are triggered as profit, which often come with franking credits since the syndicators are already paid corporate tax.
[00:48:17] Tony Kynaston: So, um. Different style of [00:48:20] investing, but it can be, if it’s delivering 25% per annum, really profitable for the investors. And it’s obviously good for peak because it allows ’em to do a lot more [00:48:30] work in this space, uh, and buy a lot more land, um, to hold as a land bank than it would if they were trying to borrow money and do it themselves.
[00:48:38] Tony Kynaston: So, um, I [00:48:40] I found that a very interesting dimension to this company and, and I think one of the reasons they’ve been around for such a long time, I wanna also just call out that, um, one of my ex-colleagues is on the [00:48:50] board. I didn’t realize that until I saw. Um, the board structure. When I was doing this research, a lady called Margaret Kennedy used to work with me at Shell and then went on to [00:49:00] be part of the Veeva, um, takeover.
[00:49:03] Tony Kynaston: When, uh, when Veeva bought the Shell Retail operations, the property was put into a property trust and Margaret was the [00:49:10] CEO of that property trust. And, uh, so has lots of experience in property and, and I always had a lot of respect for her and time for her. And she’s now on the board of, uh, Pete, which was a [00:49:20] kind of a, a nice surprise for me to see that latest results are really good for this company.
[00:49:25] Tony Kynaston: Profit was up over a hundred percent, 102% dividends were up [00:49:30] 136%. Uh, they upgraded their earnings guidance when they released the results. Uh, they had, uh, a 27% increase on contracts on hand gearing was [00:49:40] reduced to 24.7%, which was with, which was within their desired range. And they actually had a buyback last year, but closed it off at the [00:49:50] latest results announcement after buying back 4% of shares.
[00:49:53] Tony Kynaston: They didn’t quite get to our 5% threshold. Um, the other interesting thing I found out when I was [00:50:00] researching this company was a bit of a news coverage about them in the last six months or so. Uh, and I wondered whether this company could be in play so. [00:50:10] Uh, the AFR Street Talk column back in December revealed that Goldman Sachs had been hired to, uh, undertake a strategic [00:50:20] review of the company.
[00:50:21] Tony Kynaston: And the article says it’s been five months since Perth based residential developer Pete bowed the shareholder pressure and boarding Goldman Sachs to run a strategic [00:50:30] review. Now, Goldman’s real estate bankers have started courting potential buyers for the $889 million business with the expressions of interest process expected to run [00:50:40] into Christmas.
[00:50:41] Tony Kynaston: The article says there is no suggestion a takeover proposal of a takeover proposal that would require disclosure on the ASX is in front of Pete’s [00:50:50] board, but a strategic review typically opens the door for parties to register interest. The second round of due diligence will get underway in the first quarter with a whittle down group of prospective buyers.
[00:50:59] Tony Kynaston: Said [00:51:00] people briefed on the matter who requested anonymity to speak freely, so that was in the AFR. Back in 14th of 12, uh, 14th of December, [00:51:10] 2025 by Sarah Thompson Ka sued and Emma Rappaport. Uh, but, um, I, that, that sort of kicked off a bit [00:51:20] of, uh, research to find out why the board of Pete would want to initiate a strategic review, especially given the, the latest results for the company.
[00:51:29] Tony Kynaston: I thought why would they do [00:51:30] that? Um, but their thinking, uh, last year was that they were coming off a massive 60% jump in profit that was in mid 2025 and a booming [00:51:40] share price. And the leadership felt that was an opportune time to check if their business model was still the most efficient way to capture the current market tailwinds.[00:51:50]
[00:51:50] Tony Kynaston: Uh, specifically, um. They were concerned about the valuation gap, uh, which can occur in companies like this. So the company thought that its stock price [00:52:00] didn’t actually reflect the true value of its massive land bank, uh, with nearly $800 million in contracts on hand. By early 2026, the review aimed to see if a [00:52:10] different financial or structural set up, like spinning off the assets or changing how they fund projects would make the company more attractive to big institutional investors.
[00:52:19] Tony Kynaston: And they [00:52:20] also, um, mentioned that they wanted to, uh, do a review to scale for the next decade or to allow them to scale for the next decade. And the review is going to cover can they build faster to [00:52:30] meet demand? Um, is the current syndicate and develop model still the best or should they move towards something else, uh, and how can they maximize returns to [00:52:40] shareholders while the market is hot?
[00:52:41] Tony Kynaston: And they brought in Goldman Sachs to run that process. Um, however, by the 2025 A GM in November, the board [00:52:50] confirmed that they would focus on executing the strategy that they had refined, essentially doubling down on their high growth regions like WA and Queensland, or waiting for Victoria and New [00:53:00] South Wales markets to bottom out.
[00:53:02] Tony Kynaston: So it seems like, you know, they were doing something prudent in 2025 holding a review. It, it does [00:53:10] seem strange as Street Torque alluded to that. Usually when you do this, it’s about, um, some kind of, uh, sale. Um, but they did come out then at the a GM and hose that down, [00:53:20] however. Uh, the Australian, um, announced that a mystery buyer might be circling Pete, um, and that Stockland had formally [00:53:30] exited the race in terms of, uh, being involved and the Australian kind of Cryptically, cryptically has said a non-property buyer has emerged as the front [00:53:40] runner to acquire all of the residential developer Pete in the second stage of its sales process.
[00:53:45] Tony Kynaston: But then on the 16th of March, Pete came out with an announcement saying they [00:53:50] refer to further media commentary, including an article published in the Australian today regarding speculation in relation to a strategic review. As previously announced to [00:54:00] the market at its 2025 A GM on 27th and November, and subsequently confirmed on the 15th of December, Pete has been undertaking a strategic review of the [00:54:10] business to assess the optimal operational, structural and financial settings to maximize shareholder returns over the medium to longer term.
[00:54:19] Tony Kynaston: Peak confirms there [00:54:20] has been no material development since those updates, and consequently, there are no further announcements to make in relation to a strategic review. The company remains focused on [00:54:30] executing the strategy previously communicated to the market, and they go on to say they confirm that in compliance with continuous disclosure obligations under the ASX listing rules.[00:54:40]
[00:54:40] Tony Kynaston: So something’s going on, um, they’re trying to hose it down. There are rumors in the market, so this wouldn’t be the first case of a company on the buy [00:54:50] list being attracted to somebody else. It is a bit of a unique case that the process has been kicked off by the company and now they’re kind of trying to hold it a bit at arm’s length and squash it down.
[00:54:59] Tony Kynaston: So [00:55:00] no formal offers have been received or declared. Um, you can’t really put a red flag on this and say don’t buy it because it’s a takeover [00:55:10] situation yet, but it may well become one QAV Numbers look good for this company and a DT is $745,000. So it’s [00:55:20] reasonably, uh, liquid. Uh, the price for the analysis was a dollar 91, uh, but the IV one on this company is only 92 cents.
[00:55:27] Tony Kynaston: There’s no brokerage [00:55:30] coverage in Stock Doctor for this com company, so we don’t get an IV two, uh, or forecast Earnings per share. Uh, so we can’t [00:55:40] score it, um, against the consensus target or for IV two yield is, uh, a tick over 6%. So that’s above our average mortgage rate, so we can, uh, give it a score [00:55:50] for that.
[00:55:51] Tony Kynaston: Uh, Stock Doctor rate is both strong and steady from a financial health and financial trend point of view. And it gets a high rating on stock [00:56:00] Edia quality rank of 90 and an F score of eight out of nine, which is very high in stock. Edia total rank is 98, which is also pretty good. Uh, PE ratio [00:56:10] is 10.6 times.
[00:56:11] Tony Kynaston: It’s not the highest or the lowest, but it might tick over to being the lowest next half because it just missed out. Uh, three years ago there was a pe [00:56:20] slightly smaller than what it’s currently, and likewise, with consistently increasing equity, um, it just misses out because of the, um, an equity drop.
[00:56:28] Tony Kynaston: Three years ago. [00:56:30] So when that half ticks over, next half, that might change, but we don’t score it yet. Pr/OpCaf is 4.93 times, which is good. Net equity per share is a [00:56:40] dollar 39 and book plus 30 is a dollar 81. So we can’t score it for either of those. Uh, don’t have an annex per share growth forecast. [00:56:50] Uh, so we can’t score it for that officially, but I didn’t note management have upgraded guidance.
[00:56:54] Tony Kynaston: So there’s, um, there’s prob, there’s um, probably is an increase in earnings per share, but we [00:57:00] just don’t have a forecast number for it. Stock Doctor reports directly only hold 2.75%. However, that’s wrong because. Uh, one of the companies on the share [00:57:10] register is called Scorpio Nominees, and they hold 18.5%, and Scorpio nominees is, um, controlled by Tony Lennon who sits on the [00:57:20] board.
[00:57:20] Tony Kynaston: So he’s got a controlling stake in the company. Strictly speaking, he’s not a founder. His name’s not Pete, and he’s an 130 years old, but he wa has been around for a long [00:57:30] time in the company. So I was tempted to score them for own founder, but, um, I, I didn’t need to get them on the buy list. And, and b it would be a bit of a, it’s a bit of a fudge.
[00:57:39] Tony Kynaston: So [00:57:40] I left it, uh, the rules in place and I’m not scoring them for own a founder. Uh, the company isn’t a recent three point trend upturn, but the stock, ’cause the stock price has done well, [00:57:50] um, in the last sort of six months at least. So, uh, we can’t score it for that. Overall quality is seven out of 1160 4%, and the QAV score is [00:58:00] 0.13.
[00:58:00] Tony Kynaston: And you could make an argument to say it should be slightly higher than that. If you wanna count Tony Lennon as an owner, founder, and if you want to say that there’s gonna be a, uh, an earnings per [00:58:10] share, increase forecast, then you might give it a few more, but it’s on the bias at the moment. Um, risks and opportunities, so.
[00:58:17] Tony Kynaston: Uh, I think the biggest risk is what happens with the [00:58:20] strategic review. Uh, on the plus side, it may result in a takeover offer, but, um, if that, if that sort of assumptions back into the share price and it doesn’t [00:58:30] eventuate, then the price could slide. Um, and of course, this kind of company has all the normal risks of property development.
[00:58:36] Tony Kynaston: Rising interest rates will, uh, will dampen demand, um, and, [00:58:40] and possibly increase their costs. They still have some debt even though it’s low. Uh, and there’s a lot of cost inflation going on in labor and supplies at the moment. So, um, that’ll [00:58:50] force ’em to put their prices up and, uh, again, that will dampen demand as well.
[00:58:54] Tony Kynaston: Uh, so their risks, um, the, but the positives for this company is that they’ve refined their [00:59:00] strategy and their sticking to their knitting, which I think is really good. Uh, they’re, they have this capital light model for funding things, which I think is excellent. And, um, they focus on growth [00:59:10] corridors and first home buyers feeds into the chronic housing under supply scale at the moment.
[00:59:15] Tony Kynaston: So even with, um, inflation and interest rates rising, [00:59:20] I think that they’ve still got plenty of runway to, uh, to make sales, um, migration’s been up since COVID. So that’s gotta, uh, also feed into that kind of demand for those, these [00:59:30] kinds of houses. So, um. My first comment was I couldn’t see why they’d initiated the review.
[00:59:36] Tony Kynaston: Uh, and it may have just started off as being a prudent way to do a, a [00:59:40] long-term strategic plan, but, um, I kind of like what I see here, so I wouldn’t be selling a anything if I was them.
[00:59:48] Cameron Reilly: Thank you [00:59:50] Tony. I went and had a look at their, um, Forestville website. Looks nice. I love this market garden in the middle [01:00:00] of the. Community. I was just thinking Fox would love this place.
[01:00:04] Tony Kynaston: Yeah, right.
[01:00:05] Cameron Reilly: you just
[01:00:06] Tony Kynaston: Yeah. Right.
[01:00:07] Cameron Reilly: there’s a veggie garden, there’s [01:00:10] cafes and shops and looks like a, you know, good place for kids to sort of run around in the middle of the, whatever it is, the square, the [01:00:20] village square in the middle there.
[01:00:21] Tony Kynaston: Mm-hmm.
[01:00:22] Cameron Reilly: Nice, nice vision. Interesting to at their, the photos and the video on [01:00:30] their website and you know, figure out how much of it is AI generated.
[01:00:35] Tony Kynaston: yeah. Well, it’s, they’re building a growth corridor, so I guess if you use [01:00:40] Google Maps, you probably just see a, a pastor or a field there at the moment. So it’s gotta all be artist concepts, hasn’t it?
[01:00:46] Cameron Reilly: Hmm. Yeah. But I mean, yeah, artist [01:00:50] concepts now the artist is just AI
[01:00:53] Tony Kynaston: Right.
[01:00:54] Cameron Reilly: Very good. And it also, your review there gave me the title for this week’s episode, lumpy Buyback, which was [01:01:00] also, it was my porn name in the seventies. Uh, I was known as Lumpy. Buyback. No Lumpy. What was Buyback. What’d you say? Lumpy. [01:01:10] Lumpy. Payback. Lumpy. Payback. Lumpy. Hairy back. I think it was, uh, it was close enough. Good stuff. [01:01:20] Alright. After hours. Tony, what do you got? Golf by The
[01:01:24] Tony Kynaston: Yeah, love watching the Masters all weekend. Um, came down to a close finish and [01:01:30] Rory Mac Mackelroy won again, so he’s back one of the only four people in history who’ve won the Masters back to back. So it was a lot of fun and good timing for us [01:01:40] too. I’d get up in the mornings and it’d be the back nine.
[01:01:41] Tony Kynaston: So you’d see a, a fair bit of golf and exciting stuff.
[01:01:45] Cameron Reilly: Isn’t he happy? Gilmore’s nemesis, Rory McElroy.
[01:01:48] Tony Kynaston: Nah, that shoot [01:01:50] a Gavin?
[01:01:51] Cameron Reilly: That’s right.
[01:01:52] Tony Kynaston: Yeah.
[01:01:53] Cameron Reilly: Rory McElroy. Sounds like someone from a Adam Sandler or a Ben Stiller comedy or something like [01:02:00] that.
[01:02:00] Tony Kynaston: Yeah. Northern Ireland. Northern Ireland player. One of the few. Mm-hmm.
[01:02:05] Cameron Reilly: Hmm. What else? What else have you been watching? Listening to [01:02:10] reading? What’s been keeping
[01:02:11] Tony Kynaston: Yeah, Jenny and I binged, uh, landman season two, which was really good. Have you seen It [01:02:20] is, yeah,
[01:02:20] Cameron Reilly: No,
[01:02:21] Tony Kynaston: season,
[01:02:22] Cameron Reilly: of those.
[01:02:22] Tony Kynaston: season two stars. Uh, well, Demi Moore’s been in season one, but she has a bigger heart to play in season two. Uh, but Andy [01:02:30] Garcia is in it, who’s great, and Sam Elliot’s in it, who’s great as well. So it was really good to see good acting, good scripts.
[01:02:38] Tony Kynaston: Um, Jenny loved it and [01:02:40] it’s, it appeals to, I guess, males and females because you’ve got this sort of somber one problem on top of another being solved by Billy Bob in the oil industry. And then [01:02:50] you’ve got his wife, who’s this blonde tornado who goes out to old people’s homes to volunteer and gets them old drunks and takes ’em to strip clubs and all this kind of stuff.
[01:02:59] Tony Kynaston: So it’s, um, [01:03:00] it’s, it’s got a light side to it too, which is good.
[01:03:04] Cameron Reilly: Sam Elliot, I just looked him up. He’s 81. When he played [01:03:10] Virgil Urp in Tombstone in 1993. He was only 49. looked like he’s 75, I reckon for the last 40 years.
[01:03:19] Tony Kynaston: He [01:03:20] has. Yeah. And he is got that deep, deep movie preview voice, hasn’t he? You know?
[01:03:26] Cameron Reilly: he’s, he got the greatest voice in the greatest mustache.
[01:03:28] Tony Kynaston: Yeah.
[01:03:29] Cameron Reilly: have actually [01:03:30] seen a couple of his films from like the seventies before the mustache when he was sort of.
[01:03:35] Tony Kynaston: Oh
[01:03:36] Cameron Reilly: Like a sex, sex symbol leading man kind of thing. [01:03:40] And then at some point he just grew that mustache and that was it. He was just the cowboy.
[01:03:44] Tony Kynaston: yeah.
[01:03:45] Cameron Reilly: last remaining cowboy in Hollywood beat a cowboy. You [01:03:50] get Sam Elliot, uh, good stuff. Is this by the same guy who did Yellowstone and all those?
[01:03:56] Tony Kynaston: It is. It is. Yeah.
[01:03:58] Cameron Reilly: He has [01:04:00] a, he has a, like a, a template, doesn’t he?
[01:04:02] Tony Kynaston: Ooh.
[01:04:03] Cameron Reilly: these
[01:04:03] Tony Kynaston: Hmm. I, I, I really enjoyed early Taylor. Sheridan, so I think, um, he [01:04:10] was hell or high water, the movie, which I think is fantastic. Really highly recommended if people haven’t seen it. Um, and then I wasn’t a big Yellowstone fan or any of [01:04:20] the other ones, but I do like Landman. It’s good.
[01:04:22] Cameron Reilly: Hmm. I thought you were into the other ones. I thought you liked Yellowstone.
[01:04:25] Tony Kynaston: No, to me it was, it was Dallas
[01:04:29] Cameron Reilly: Yeah. I.
[01:04:29] Tony Kynaston: [01:04:30] for, for this century.
[01:04:31] Cameron Reilly: We watched the first episode of one of those. It, it might’ve been Yellowstone, I think. And it was, yeah, it was just too networky formulaic
[01:04:39] Tony Kynaston: [01:04:40] Yeah. Yeah. So I found it too. Yep.
[01:04:43] Cameron Reilly: Same, same with Sons of Anarchy, um, which I think he acted in, but, uh, I
[01:04:48] Tony Kynaston: Oh, really?
[01:04:49] Cameron Reilly: that sadly.
[01:04:49] Tony Kynaston: I [01:04:50] never saw that.
[01:04:50] Cameron Reilly: uh, it was by one of the guys who, um, Kurt Sutter created it. He was one of the writers on the Shield, which we loved.
[01:04:58] Tony Kynaston: Oh, right.
[01:04:59] Cameron Reilly: in the shield. [01:05:00] Anyway, well, uh, what have I got? Uh, the John Candy Doco. We started watching
[01:05:06] Tony Kynaston: Yeah, I’ve seen that. It’s good, isn’t it? Yeah.
[01:05:09] Cameron Reilly: [01:05:10] so great.
[01:05:10] Tony Kynaston: Yep.
[01:05:11] Cameron Reilly: I mean, everyone loves John Candy.
[01:05:14] Cameron Reilly: How do you not love John Candy?
[01:05:15] Tony Kynaston: Mm.
[01:05:16] Cameron Reilly: Um, what a sweetheart he was. [01:05:20] Uh, I’ve been watching the later season or the final season of the boys, I think. ’cause my boys keep saying, have you watched the boys yet? So
[01:05:28] Tony Kynaston: You recommend [01:05:30] it?
[01:05:30] Cameron Reilly: Have you seen any of it?
[01:05:31] Tony Kynaston: No.
[01:05:33] Cameron Reilly: Oh yeah. Like it’s super Seth Rogey, like, [01:05:40] it’s
[01:05:40] Tony Kynaston: Okay.
[01:05:41] Cameron Reilly: sexually disgusting, uber violent, but sort of that, you know, Tarantino comical levels [01:05:50] of uber violence,
[01:05:51] Tony Kynaston: Mm-hmm.
[01:05:52] Cameron Reilly: lot of guts, a lot of super violence.
[01:05:55] Cameron Reilly: But you know, it depicts psychopathic [01:06:00] superheroes and the psychopathic good guys that are trying to stop the psychopathic superheroes based on a really good comic by Garth Enni from the nineties. But, [01:06:10] um, as the show’s gone on, they’ve just lent more and more into Trump’s America. So the superheroes are basically running a fascist [01:06:20] state where, freedom is for the free. They have concentration camps called Freedom Camps that they put lefty protestors in. And uh, yeah, [01:06:30] they just, it’s like down to ride a season. They just take everything that Trump and his cabinet’s done in the last six months and they just work it into storylines. But it’s fascists, superheroes [01:06:40] are doing it instead of Trump and his, uh, um, uh, the highest [01:06:50] grossing Bollywood film of all time, which only came out last year.
[01:06:56] Tony Kynaston: I thought [01:07:00] bride and prejudice was the highest grossing.
[01:07:02] Cameron Reilly: I think it was every year, whatever film
[01:07:04] Tony Kynaston: Yeah. Okay.
[01:07:05] Cameron Reilly: grossing, they get bigger and bigger every year.
[01:07:07] Tony Kynaston: Yeah, it makes sense. Yep.
[01:07:08] Cameron Reilly: is a full [01:07:10] on action film on a true story of. during the, the [01:07:20] Pakistan India border wars terrorist attacks, they send a guy, the Indians send a guy in undercover into [01:07:30] to infiltrate the gangs in the terrorist networks and to bring him down from the inside. uh, he looks like a, an Indian version of, [01:07:40] uh, uh, Carl Drogo, whatever that actor’s name is, um,
[01:07:44] Tony Kynaston: Oh
[01:07:44] Cameron Reilly: of
[01:07:45] Tony Kynaston: yeah. Okay.
[01:07:45] Cameron Reilly: moa, Jason Mao,
[01:07:47] Tony Kynaston: Yeah, right.
[01:07:48] Cameron Reilly: guy with big, long [01:07:50] hair and like, not fit in. You know, you’re looking around the slums of Karachi and you see this guy and you’d be like, really?
[01:07:58] Tony Kynaston: Yeah. You [01:08:00] eating two or three little guys a day.
[01:08:01] Cameron Reilly: Yeah, wouldn’t be an undercover guy. Come down, take us down. Why do you look like John Rambo? Uh. [01:08:10] You are working in a, you know, a chai tea shop. Really? Ah, something doesn’t work with this picture. Anyway. Very, very
[01:08:17] Tony Kynaston: it’s like, like that movie. Do you ever [01:08:20] see the Australian movie Stone from the seventies?
[01:08:23] Cameron Reilly: Oh, no, I don’t think I’ve ever seen
[01:08:25] Tony Kynaston: Yeah. It’s, it’s not bad. It’s worth watching action movie from the seventies about [01:08:30] motorcycle gangs. But the,
[01:08:31] Cameron Reilly: Yeah.
[01:08:31] Tony Kynaston: the cop sent an undercover copying to these bikes with long hair and denim jackets and he’s got short backing sides and tucks his [01:08:40] shirt in and
[01:08:40] Cameron Reilly: Mustache.
[01:08:42] Tony Kynaston: it’s like, but none of them say, oh, you must be a cop
[01:08:46] Cameron Reilly: They don’t pick it up. [01:08:50] Uh, and apart from Asher Bley, I’ve been listening to Otis Redding. I really, you know, I’ve only ever heard Otis Redding’s. [01:09:00] hits sitting
[01:09:01] Tony Kynaston: dock of the.
[01:09:01] Cameron Reilly: the bay, that kinda stuff. I’ve been going deep dive into Otis Redding’s small catalog. Oh my God.
[01:09:08] Tony Kynaston: It’s good, isn’t it?
[01:09:09] Cameron Reilly: [01:09:10] oh, amazing. I’d forgotten that he wrote hard to handle, the song that the Black Crows had a hit with in the nineties.
[01:09:19] Cameron Reilly: Uh, did the original [01:09:20] version of that, but just, and he wrote respect,
[01:09:22] Tony Kynaston: Mm
[01:09:23] Cameron Reilly: originally, but just like the brass section and the whole thing. Oh man. So good. [01:09:30] And do you know how he died?
[01:09:31] Tony Kynaston: Oh, yeah. Um, didn’t they pull him out of the bay? His plane crashed into the bay or something.
[01:09:36] Cameron Reilly: Yeah. Plane
[01:09:37] Tony Kynaston: Mm-hmm.
[01:09:37] Cameron Reilly: three days after he recorded [01:09:40] sitting on the dock of the Bay plane crashed, uh, a little light aircraft here and the Barques were in his band and they all died except one, one guy survived. The rest of them [01:09:50] died. Tragic. Um,
[01:09:52] Tony Kynaston: Yeah. I once had a double album record of his greatest hits, I guess, or his canon. It was really [01:10:00] good.
[01:10:00] Cameron Reilly: Oh, so good. I’m kicking myself that I’ve, you know, he is one of those guys, one of those r and b guys that, you know, he turns up on playlists and you go, that’s great, but never [01:10:10] taken the time to drill down. Really, really enjoying it. Well, that’s it for me, Uh, I’ve got an [01:10:20] exciting, uh, American show to do for, by the way, I’ve had one or two people, I thought I had made this quite clear in my emails over the last few months, [01:10:30] but the occasional email from people saying, Hey, how come I can’t see the American list anymore? When, of when official with the American, [01:10:40] uh, subscriber system, membership system a few months ago, uh, it, it is now. You have to be a a a a, an American. have to have a [01:10:50] subscription to QAV America or a light subscription to get access to the buy lists or the full podcasts or the light stuff over there. [01:11:00] So, um, if you’re wondering, if you are wondering why you can’t get your hands on it, that’s probably why. But if you’re a long time Australian subscriber and you wanna, you get your hands on [01:11:10] the American stuff, just shoot me an email and we’ll work something out. We’ll look after you, don’t you worry about it. Uh, that’s it. Alright, let’s go talk about [01:11:20] pugs, PAGS, the Brazilian FinTech. is pretty interesting story.
[01:11:29] Tony Kynaston: Yeah. [01:11:30] Good.
[01:11:30] Cameron Reilly: pretty interesting. Pug, pug Bank. PAGP, pa P in Italian, tope [01:11:40] pga, same Latin route as PAO
[01:11:42] Tony Kynaston: Yeah,
[01:11:43] Cameron Reilly: Portuguese apparently. Okay. Thanks tk. Have a
[01:11:48] Tony Kynaston: thanks [01:11:50] Cam.

0 Comments