Transcript QAV S03E01 — Intro To QAV

QAV Reboot 301

Length:  1:03:11

 (00:04)

Intro: This is QAV a pod­cast for peo­ple who want to learn how to invest like a pro­fes­sion­al.

(00:13)

Cameron Reil­ly: Wel­come every­body to the first episode of QAV Reboot 301, the reboot series. My name is Cameron Reil­ly; with me is my part­ner in crime, Tony Kynas­ton. How are you, Tony?

(00:31)

Tony Kynas­ton: I’m good. How are you?

(00:32)

Cameron Reil­ly: Good, thank you, mate. We’re record­ing this late March or March 23rd, 2020. We’re both cur­rent­ly in lock­down from coro­n­avirus. And I want to explain for new lis­ten­ers and for old lis­ten­ers, the con­cept of the reboot. So, we’ve been doing this pod­cast now for about a year and change. And over that peri­od of time, as we’ve been explain­ing Tony’s invest­ment method­ol­o­gy and who Tony is, we’ll get to that in a minute, if you’re brand new, but Tony has an invest­ing method­ol­o­gy that he’s been devel­op­ing for over 25, 30 years. And what we do on this pod­cast is we explain how that works.

Now, when we start­ed this pod­cast 13 months, 14 months ago, yeah, it was okay. I did my best to make it a good show. I’ve been doing pod­casts for 15 years, so, I know how to make a pod­cast, but I was com­plete­ly out of my depth when it came to Tony’s invest­ing, finan­cial data and ter­mi­nol­o­gy and the mod­el­ing, and all this kind of stuff. So, it took me a long time to get up to speed. I reck­on at least six months before I felt a lit­tle bit com­fort­able with it. And con­se­quent­ly, those episodes, there’s a lot of me dog-pad­dling through this stuff, try­ing to keep my head above water.

And Tony was­n’t real­ly used to, A, speak­ing on a micro­phone and, B, artic­u­lat­ing this to any­body out­side of him­self at 3:00 AM over a scotch because he’s just done it him­self for 30 years. Apart from his fam­i­ly, he’s nev­er real­ly had to explain it to any­one before. And as he’s been explain­ing it on the show over the last year and a bit, he’s got a lot bet­ter at it. In fact, he’s very good at it now he’s, War­ren Buf­fett in train­ing with his bon mots. So, we had din­ner in Syd­ney last week before the lock­down with some of our QAV lis­ten­ers in Syd­ney. And they sug­gest­ed, Hey, why don’t you redo those episodes? Because I think you’ll do a bet­ter job of them now.

Now, that you’re a lot more flu­ent in how to talk about this stuff. And we thought what a great idea, much eas­i­er for new lis­ten­ers to start with these reboot ver­sions. Also, the check­list that we use it’s Tony’s IP, but I want­ed to build my own. So, I got my head around it and it’s gone through lots of changes over the last 30 months as I’ve improved on the check­list and stream­lined it, mod­i­fied it. So, if you’re start­ing at 101, episode 101, you’re going to have to go through all the dif­fer­ent check­list changes in a lin­ear time­line. If you start with this one, you’ll be able to use the lat­est ver­sion, at least as of March 2020.

I don’t think it’s going to change a lot from here, but who knows? So, any­way, Tony, that’s my pre­am­ble out of the way we do want to always start with this. Dis­claimer, this pod­cast is an infor­ma­tion provider. We’re giv­ing you infor­ma­tion about how Tony invests and we will talk about stocks and we will talk about oth­er invest­ment vehi­cles, but we’re not rec­om­mend­ing that you buy any­thing. We’re not rec­om­mend­ing that you invest this way. We are not finan­cial advi­sors. We haven’t tak­en into account your indi­vid­ual invest­ment objec­tives or finan­cial cir­cum­stances or needs.

Please don’t take any­thing you ever hear on this pod­cast or on our web­site or in our emails as finan­cial advice. If you need finan­cial advice, go see a finan­cial advi­sor. What this pod­cast is about is explain­ing how one guy who’s a very suc­cess­ful pro­fes­sion­al investor, and has been doing it for decades, how he thinks how he invests to basi­cal­ly teach finan­cial lit­er­a­cy one way of valu­ing a stock and decid­ing what it’s worth and what to pay for it. But don’t take it as finan­cial advice is my bot­tom line here. I hope I’ve been very clear about that. Tony, do you want to add any­thing?

(04:34)

Tony Kynas­ton: No, that was a good sum­ma­ry.

(04:36)

Cameron Reil­ly: Well, the way that we start­ed the orig­i­nal series, and I think we should start this one as well is to talk a lit­tle bit about you, Tony. I know it’s your least favorite sub­ject to talk about. You’re quite a qui­et fel­low by the way, for new lis­ten­ers Tony and I go back over 12 years, we’ve known each oth­er a long time. We’ve become friends. We’ve worked on a num­ber of projects togeth­er. We’ve writ­ten a book, we’ve made a film; we’ve trav­eled the world for fun. And so, we know each oth­er very well. Now, dur­ing those 12 years, I did­n’t real­ly know much about how Tony made mon­ey.

I did assume for a while that he was some kind of a hit­man for the mob, prob­a­bly the Irish Mob, because he’s quite tall, pale, and has red hair. So, he did­n’t look Ital­ian and I think I asked you ear­ly on, what do you do, Tony? He said, Oh, I’m just an investor. Then I was like, okay. And that was it. I think it was over our first din­ner at a Tep­pa­nya­ki restau­rant in For­ti­tude Val­ley, 11, 12 years ago. And that was basi­cal­ly it. I went all right. Well, obvi­ous­ly you don’t want to share, so, okay. I’ll just do all the talk­ing then shall I.

(05:59)

Tony Kynas­ton: You do all the talk­ing any­way.

(06:00)

Cameron Reil­ly: I know. That’s the joke there. And then about the begin­ning of 2019, I have twin sons who were 18 at the time they had their own pod­cast and they said, Tony is quite a wealthy guy, right? I said, yeah, I think so. And they said, well, we want to talk about mon­ey man­age­ment and mak­ing mon­ey for our audi­ence. Do you think Tony would come on and be a guest? And I said, yeah, I’m sure he’d be hap­py to. And you did that. And I lis­tened to that episode. And in that episode, you actu­al­ly explained your invest­ing method­ol­o­gy at a very high lev­el. And I was like, what you have a sys­tem for mak­ing mon­ey and you’ve nev­er told it to me, you rat bas­tard.

(06:46)

Tony Kynas­ton: You’ve nev­er had any mon­ey, any­way. You kept telling me that you had no mon­ey.

(06:49)

Cameron Reil­ly: Well, that’s true. I have no mon­ey, but if I had mon­ey, it would have been good to know how to invest it. And, so a cou­ple of days lat­er, I said to Tony, why don’t we do a pod­cast about this method that you have? And you’re like, real­ly? Would any­one want to lis­ten to that? And I was like, yeah, I think some peo­ple might like to know how to invest suc­cess­ful­ly. And that’s been the show. And of course, over this time it’s been rel­a­tive­ly suc­cess­ful and a lot of peo­ple have expressed their appre­ci­a­tion to us. But to you most­ly for tak­ing your time freely at no charge over the last year to talk about the basics of wealth cre­ation, through invest­ing and the basic fun­da­men­tals of how to be a suc­cess­ful investor. So, that’s the Gen­e­sis of the shot, but Tony, why don’t we go back and tell us, well, before you became an investor, what was your career like?

(07:47)

Tony Kynas­ton: I had a career in retail for 20 years. So, I start­ed off after uni­ver­si­ty in the IT depart­ment at the Shell Com­pa­ny of Aus­tralia. And after a cou­ple of years in IT, I felt like I was­n’t part of the action. So, I moved across into the retail side of Shell, which is the sec­tion that looks after ser­vice sta­tions and dis­trib­u­tors and does the actu­al busi­ness of sell­ing petro­le­um prod­ucts, and worked my way up from there into gen­er­al man­age­ment roles. I start­ed off in the finan­cial plan­ning area.

So, I’ve got a good overview of how Shell oper­ates in Aus­tralia. And then went out into the field in Queens­land and looked after the Auto­care fran­chis­es and all the ser­vice sta­tions around Queens­land, North­ern Ter­ri­to­ry, and the car wash­es and then became the Cen­tral Queens­land, ter­ri­to­ry man­ag­er. So, I looked after some big fuel dis­trib­u­tor­ships and some ser­vice sta­tions, I don’t want to say hooked after. I was basi­cal­ly the fran­chise or they were the fran­chisee. So, lots of dis­cus­sions around how to price prod­ucts, going after and win­ning big con­tracts, look­ing after health, safe­ty, and envi­ron­ment.

(08:56)

Cameron Reil­ly: We don’t need to go into that much detail, Tony. You were a cor­po­rate exec­u­tive at Coles and Shell. That’s basi­cal­ly all I was look­ing for.

(09:04)

Tony Kynas­ton: Oh, okay.

(09:05)

Cameron Reil­ly: You ran very large com­pa­nies for 20 years. Okay.

(09:09)

Tony Kynas­ton: I did at Coles Myer and then Shell.

(09:12)

Cameron Reil­ly: And then when did your invest­ing career start?

(09:16)

Tony Kynas­ton: I feel like this reboot should be called pod­cast atten­tion. I mean, lock­down hav­ing to redo my work. I thought we’d slide that one through last year. It’s like being in The Break­fast Club with­out Mol­ly Ring­wald and Ally Sheedy.

(09:33)

Cameron Reil­ly: Who am I Judd Nel­son or the teacher?

(09:37)

Tony Kynas­ton: The teacher.

(09:38)

Cameron Reil­ly: Ah, okay. Yeah.

(09:41)

Tony Kynas­ton: Any­way. So, what was the ques­tion? Sor­ry.

(09:44)

Cameron Reil­ly: How did your invest­ing career start?

(09:47)

Tony Kynas­ton: Yeah, good ques­tion. So, when I was at Shell and it would have been, I’m guess­ing the mid-nineties, so, towards the end of my time there they came up with a way of giv­ing us some extra remu­ner­a­tion by offer­ing us a loan that had to be used for invest­ment pur­pos­es. You could­n’t buy a house and live in it with this loan. It was to the amount of your annu­al salary. And it was offered at a low-inter­est rate. The kind of inter­est rate Shell was get­ting when they bor­rowed mon­ey, which was less than the mar­ket rate. And I thought that was a great idea.

And a cou­ple of friends and I got togeth­er and we said, well, what are we going to do? How are we going to invest it, let’s take Shell up on this offer? And so we did, and we did a bit of inves­ti­ga­tion and we spoke to a guy who was a prop­er­ty devel­op­er about going into part­ner­ship with him. We went to some big-name stock­bro­kers and asked for their advice. And we thought both of those were a bit too pedes­tri­an because we were gung-ho young mas­ters of the uni­verse at Shell. We want­ed to invest in things that were going to dou­ble our mon­ey quick­ly. And we start­ed doing all the wrong things because we were aggres­sive.

So we took tips from peo­ple from, stock­bro­kers, from our col­leagues in the upstream side of the busi­ness who were involved in start­up petro­le­um drilling com­pa­nies, and the like. And basi­cal­ly after about a year, I lost half of my cap­i­tal through most­ly pen­ny dread­ful invest­ments in the min­ing sec­tor. And yeah, that was a bit of a wake-up call and I thought shit not only have I lost half my cap­i­tal, but even­tu­al­ly I’ll have to pay it back. And so, I’ve got to find it from some­where too. So, that was like a dou­ble wham­my. And so I start­ed to sub­scribe to what­ev­er you say there, I could find on invest­ing, read any book I could find on invest­ing.

And one day I hap­pened to be in an air­port book­shop and I came across The Mak­ing Of An Amer­i­can Cap­i­tal­ist a book by a guy named Roger Lowen­stein. And it was a book about War­ren Buf­fett and it real­ly res­onat­ed with me the whole idea of val­ue invest­ing, his sto­ry had a much more sci­en­tif­ic feel to it than what I’d been used to so far in things I’d read or heard. And it also had a very good take on how to take the emo­tion out of it. And just make com­mon sense and it seemed sim­ple. And so, I start­ed apply­ing those prin­ci­ples and even­tu­al­ly got my mon­ey back and was able to pay Shell out in the loan when I left and moved across to Coles Myer and the invest­ment bug bit. And I went from there.

(12:26)

Cameron Reil­ly: For peo­ple who don’t know who War­ren Buf­fett is although I think most peo­ple prob­a­bly do we’ll talk more about him in a minute. So, how long have you been a full-time pro­fes­sion­al investor now, Tony?

(12:38)

Tony Kynas­ton: Well, I retired when I was 43, so, about 14 years ago. And the caveat is that my wife has been work­ing, so, we’d been able to live off her income and then invest all of our cap­i­tal or time to let that grow.

(12:55)

Cameron Reil­ly: You decid­ed to be a stay at home dad and just man­age the invest­ment port­fo­lio.

(13:00)

Tony Kynas­ton: Jen­ny and I joke about her being P & L and me being bal­ance sheet. So, she’s cash flow and I’m cap­i­tal. And I had the ben­e­fit of rais­ing my daugh­ter, which was fan­tas­tic. We have a great rela­tion­ship because of that.

(13:13)

Cameron Reil­ly: And it’s not because you’re some sort of a misog­y­nist and you sent your wife out to work. We should point out that. Your wife, Jen­ny is a very suc­cess­ful, cor­po­rate exec­u­tive and loved her work and did­n’t want to retire. Could have retired, had the option but chose not to until recent­ly.

(13:33)

Tony Kynas­ton: Well, she may retire although she’s talk­ing about going back to work. She resigned from her cur­rent role recent­ly. And that will be fin­ish­ing up soon and she’s going to take six months off and con­sid­er her options.

(13:43)

Cameron Reil­ly: But you’ve basi­cal­ly been a pro­fes­sion­al investor now for sev­er­al decades and full-time for the last 14, 15 years.

(13:51)

Tony Kynas­ton: Yeah. That’s right. Invest­ing since about, I would say the mid-nineties, so 25 years.

(13:57)

Cameron Reil­ly: And the aver­age return on your port­fo­lio over that 25-year peri­od.

(14:04)

Tony Kynas­ton: Nine­teen and a half per­cent. And again, full dis­clo­sure. It’s prob­a­bly going to drop now that the mar­ket’s tank­ing, but I think once we come out, the oth­er side of it; we’ll be back up there again. When I say tank, it might drop to 18%, some­thing like that, 17, but at the moment, as of the end of last year, 19 and a half per­cent.

(14:24)

Cameron Reil­ly: Now to put that into per­spec­tive. Because when you first told me that, I mean, it sound­ed good, but I did­n’t real­ly know how good it was over the last 50 or 60 years that War­ren Buf­fett has been invest­ing with Berk­shire Hath­away. I think he claims that his aver­age annu­al return is about 19.8%. Does that sound right, 19.7 or 19.8?

(14:47)

Tony Kynas­ton: It’s some­thing around that def­i­nite­ly above 19.

(14:51)

Cameron Reil­ly: So, that means that there are some years when it’s going to be much high­er than 19%, some years when it will be low­er. Like this year, for exam­ple, when the mar­ket has tanked due to coro­n­avirus. But on aver­age, over 10, 20 years and beyond it aver­ages out at nine­teen and a half per­cent. So, for peo­ple who have been around invest­ing for a while, they will know that all odds, the Aus­tralian stock exchange and it’s true of oth­er stock exchanges, like in the US or any oth­er coun­try if you look at their aver­age growth over decades, it tends to be some­where around 9, 10, 11%, depend­ing on which exchange you’re look­ing at.

Again, some years it will be high­er. Some years will be low, but on aver­age, it’s about 10%. Let’s say just for a quick heuris­tic. And you’re basi­cal­ly dou­bling that your objec­tive is to basi­cal­ly dou­ble the index.

(15:48)

Tony Kynas­ton: Cor­rect. Yes. Dou­ble the mar­ket on the premise that if we can fil­ter out the bad stock some of the rest must do bet­ter than the index. So again, not rock­et sci­ence. And that might be a sim­ple state­ment or sounds like a sim­ple state­ment, but it’s hard to put into prac­tice because the fil­ter is the key. But yeah, if you think about it, if you take out the rot­ten apples, the rest should be edi­ble.

(16:09)

Cameron Reil­ly: And we’ll talk about how you do that as we go along. My own brief bio, my name’s Cameron Reil­ly. I had a career in sort of tech in the nineties. I worked at one of Aus­trali­a’s first ISPs in the mid-nineties. Then I got a job at Microsoft in the late nineties I was at Microsoft for sev­en years, sort of one of the.com guys, first ear­ly sort of inter­net peo­ple that Microsoft hired I’d trav­el around the coun­try and talk to CIOs about what the inter­net was and what HTML was and how Microsoft was going to make the inter­net so much bet­ter. I left that in 2004 and start­ed Aus­trali­a’s very first ever pod­cast.

Believe it or not, it was called G’day World. And then in ear­ly 2005, I start­ed the world’s first pod­cast net­work cun­ning­ly called The Pod­cast Net­work and built that up for a few years and was mak­ing mon­ey out of adver­tis­ing until the GFC hit in 2008. And we lost all of our adver­tis­ing overnight. And I went and cried in a cor­ner for a cou­ple of years and did some mar­ket­ing jobs came back into pod­cast­ing in 2013. And today I make my liv­ing out of pro­duc­ing pod­casts, most­ly on ancient his­to­ry. If you want to check those out, go to thepodcastnetwork.com and despite work­ing in the stock mar­ket when I was 18 just after the 87 crash for a while and work­ing for a pri­vate invest­ment firm a lit­tle bit after that.

I have had a num­ber of failed star­tups, been divorced sev­er­al times. I’m the world’s worst mon­ey man­ag­er com­plete­ly broke, even though I’m near­ly 50, lost it all in divorces and start­up fail­ures. So, the premise for the show basi­cal­ly is Tony who is very good with mon­ey is teach­ing me a com­plete idiot how to stop being a com­plete idiot and you, the audi­ence get to lis­ten as he does that. Now, Tony let’s talk a lit­tle bit about val­ue invest­ing your style of invest­ing, you men­tioned War­ren Buf­fett before. Can you give us a quick back­ground on val­ue invest­ing and why you think it is the best form of invest­ing?

(18:27)

Tony Kynas­ton: Yeah, sure. I mean, I think if you take it back to first prin­ci­ples, all invest­ing is val­ue invest­ing. We’re all try­ing to buy some­thing now, which we think is under­val­ued and will be worth more in the future. But there are dif­fer­ent ways of doing that. And then there are peo­ple who focus on growth. So, they’re look­ing for com­pa­nies which they think will grow quick­ly and they buy those. There are peo­ple who think that the best way to invest is by the qual­i­ty and they don’t real­ly care about the price. As long as the com­pa­ny is a high-qual­i­ty com­pa­ny and they’ll buy those.

And there are peo­ple who kind of do a bit of both and they’re called momen­tum investors. So, they fol­low the trends in the stock mar­ket, but a val­ue investor is look­ing for things that sell for less than what’s called the intrin­sic val­ue. And that’s the kind of rub, you got to work out what the intrin­sic val­ue is. And you’ve got to find the undis­cov­ered com­pa­nies, so, to speak that are trad­ing below what they real­ly should trade for. And that’s what val­ue invest­ing is.

(19:29)

Cameron Reil­ly: So, how does War­ren Buf­fett fit into this, Tony?

(19:32)

Tony Kynas­ton: Well, he’s prob­a­bly the most famous val­ue investor there are oth­ers, but he’s been around for a long time. The guy is, I think about 87 or 88 years old now, maybe even 89, I’m not sure he has a part­ner called Char­lie Munger, who’s even old­er and they’d been doing it since the fifties and six­ties. Buf­fett learned at Colum­bia Uni­ver­si­ty at the feet of a guy called Ben Gra­ham and Ben Gra­ham along with his col­league Dodd I for­got Dod­d’s first name, but any­way wrote a book called, Oh shit, what’s it called? Guess my mem­o­ry’s going; we’ve been talk­ing for too long.

Secu­ri­ties Analy­sis, sor­ry about that they wrote a book on how to ana­lyze secu­ri­ties and that led to the con­cept of intrin­sic val­ue and to some of the con­cepts that Buf­fett has con­tin­ued to teach, like the fact that price is what you pay and val­ue is what you get. And in the short term, the mar­ket is a vot­ing machine, but in the long-term, it’s a weigh­ing machine.

(20:36)

Cameron Reil­ly: What does that mean? Can you explain that?

(20:39)

Tony Kynas­ton: Yeah. So, a stock mar­ket is a mar­ket, it’s peo­ple com­ing togeth­er to buy and sell prod­ucts. And in this case, the prod­uct is a com­pa­ny. And so, it’s sub­ject to all the kinds of psy­chol­o­gy and whims of human nature that we encounter every day. And that’s why in the short-term, it’s a vot­ing machine. So, shares and their prices will move accord­ing to how peo­ple vote with their feet in the short-term. So, at the moment, the shares are going down quick­ly because peo­ple are sell­ing up and get­ting out of the mar­ket. So, the votes at the moment are the votes are in, and the mar­ket’s crash­ing.

Peo­ple are, going to cash, but in the long-term, a share price of a com­pa­ny should rep­re­sent what its intrin­sic val­ue is. And we’ll have to talk in detail about what that means, but basi­cal­ly, the weigh­ing machine comes into play in the long-term. So if, for exam­ple, BHP is a good com­pa­ny, even though it’s being sold off now, even­tu­al­ly the share price will track­back to what it should be to reflect the accu­rate val­ue of BHP.

(21:45)

Cameron Reil­ly: I remem­ber I’ve got a quote from Buf­fett some­where here. Let me just find it. If a busi­ness does well, the stock usu­al­ly fol­lows. So, he’s try­ing to basi­cal­ly in my under­stand­ing of val­ue invest­ing at a very sim­ple lev­el. Is it’s look­ing for well-per­form­ing com­pa­nies, good qual­i­ty com­pa­nies that are well-man­aged have a good busi­ness, good prospects for the future, they’re mak­ing cash, and it looks like they’re going to con­tin­ue to per­form well for the future. Because gen­er­al­ly speak­ing, the shares of those com­pa­nies will do well. And then, B, the sec­ond com­po­nent of it is buy­ing stocks in those com­pa­nies, when you can buy them at a rea­son­able price, you work out what you think the val­ue of that stock is on any giv­en day. And then you try and buy it at a dis­count to that. And that’s basi­cal­ly it.

(22:43)

Tony Kynas­ton: Yeah, that’s right. There’s a lot of things to unpack in those sim­ple state­ments, but that’s essen­tial­ly what I do is try and mar­ry some kind of mea­sure­ment or rat­ing of what the qual­i­ty of a com­pa­ny is with a rat­ing or analy­sis of how dis­count­ed the share price is to what I think it’s worth. And just more on Buf­fett, I mean, the guy’s been invest­ing for a long time. So, he has gone through a cou­ple of iter­a­tions of that whole process. Ear­ly on in his career, he was focus­ing on more of the val­ue side of things and pay less atten­tion to qual­i­ty. Then he teamed up with Char­lie Munger and Munger con­vinced him to pay more atten­tion to the qual­i­ty side of things.

And he went from try­ing to buy things at deep dis­counts to pay­ing a fair price for a qual­i­ty com­pa­ny. And now he’s prob­a­bly more focused on the qual­i­ty side of things. How can I pre­serve my cap­i­tal going for­ward?

(23:37)

Cameron Reil­ly: Because now he’s spend­ing hun­dreds of bil­lions of dol­lars to buy large chunks or entire chunks of busi­ness, he’s not just trad­ing on the mar­ket as you or I would.

(23:49)

Tony Kynas­ton: Cor­rect.

(23:49)

Cameron Reil­ly: It’s a dif­fer­ent kind of game.

(23:52)

Tony Kynas­ton: Most of these invest­ments are out­side the share mar­ket now, even though it’s still a big part of Berk­shire Hath­away, which is his com­pa­ny. I think maybe about three-quar­ters is actu­al­ly, or the mar­ket cap­i­tal­iza­tion is tied up in direct invest­ments in com­pa­nies.

(24:06)

Cameron Reil­ly: And one of the things I’ve learned since we’ve been doing this show is that val­ue invest­ing this style is Buf­fett or Ben­jamin Gra­ham’s style of invest­ing. It goes through cycles in terms of its pop­u­lar­i­ty in the mar­ket. Last year we were at the tail end, as it turned out of a fair­ly long bull mar­ket, a boom­ing mar­ket, and peo­ple weren’t inter­est­ed in val­ue invest­ing, gen­er­al­ly speak­ing, they thought it was bor­ing. They thought it was out of fash­ion. This time it’s dif­fer­ent.

They would say to us, and they want­ed to put all their mon­ey in tech stocks, high growth stocks that would nev­er get through your check­list because quite often they’re either los­ing mon­ey or their PA ratios are too high and a vari­ety of oth­er things. And their future is uncer­tain, but their share price is going up, up, up. And so peo­ple jump on board and they think val­ue invest­ing is bor­ing, of course, then the mar­ket crash­es. And typ­i­cal­ly if I under­stand my his­to­ry val­ue invest­ing will become a lit­tle bit more val­ued by the mar­ket in the next five years. But then the mar­ket will get back to a cycle again, where it’ll hit anoth­er boom time and peo­ple will be like, ah, val­ue invest­ing is stu­pid.

It’s dead, it’s over. But what I’ve learned from you over the last year is that, yeah, some peo­ple make mon­ey dur­ing boom times by jump­ing on band­wag­ons, but then they tend to lose mon­ey more than they make mon­ey. It’s very dif­fi­cult to find any­one who isn’t a val­ue investor who has pro­duced con­sis­tent rough­ly 20% returns year in, year out, over decades, out­side of val­ue investors.

(26:01)

Tony Kynas­ton: Yeah. I’d agree with that. There prob­a­bly are excep­tions, and obvi­ous­ly, the ven­ture cap­i­tal­ists in Sil­i­con Val­ley may have had sim­i­lar results from invest­ing in tech stocks or bet­ter results from invest­ing in tech stocks. But most­ly the suc­cess­ful long-term investors are val­ue investors.

(26:18)

Cameron Reil­ly: I’m talk­ing about reg­u­lar peo­ple, investors.

(26:21)

Tony Kynas­ton: Yeah, no, that’s right reg­u­lar peo­ple investors. And just to unpack that a bit, I mean, we saw it hap­pen­ing last year. This is what hap­pens. Maybe it’s an indi­ca­tor of the top of a bull mar­ket. If you look at when val­ue funds start going down with­in about two or three years, the mar­ket crash­es, and what hap­pens is it’s because of peo­ple espe­cial­ly new to the share mar­ket. And often­times, in this case, it was mil­len­ni­als are going out say­ing 20%. I brought a mate who bought into After­pay at five bucks and he’s made 250% year on year going for­ward, blah, blah, blah.

And I could name any of the oth­er tech stocks in, what they call the wax in Aus­tralia or the Fang com­pa­nies in the US and it’s true, but look at them most of them are crash­ing not all of them, but most of them are crash­ing and often­times crash­ing worse than the rest of the mar­ket. And we’re at the ear­ly stages of a share mar­ket cor­rec­tion at the moment, in my opin­ion. And they’re going to be starved for cap­i­tal going for­ward and start to eat up all their cash. And that’s when you hang on for the white knuck­le ride and it’s the mil­len­ni­als, or I should­n’t pick on any par­tic­u­lar class of peo­ple. It’s the peo­ple who have fol­lowed that trend and thought that 20% year on year, was­n’t good enough who are prob­a­bly locked into those stocks. And they may recov­er, but a lot will go broke.

(27:46)

Cameron Reil­ly: And we should point out that the stock mar­ket, like every oth­er mar­ket, but prob­a­bly even more so trades on the fact that there are whole gen­er­a­tions of new investors com­ing in every few years who are greedy and impa­tient and want to make quick returns. There are a lot of old-timers out there that smell new meat and take advan­tage of that. And it’s the old dogs like you, the old fud­dy-dud­dies, like Alan Cola, called you, whether or not he actu­al­ly did. I can’t remem­ber, but as far as I’m con­cerned, he did, he at least inti­mat­ed it. If he did­n’t use those words, when he was on our show, just stick to basic time-worn, test­ed prin­ci­ples that have worked for War­ren Buf­fett and Char­lie Munger for 60 years.

(28:42)

Tony Kynas­ton: And they’re still around and they’re still going and they’re in their eight­ies and nineties and they’re incred­i­bly wealthy. And they sleep well at night. I think one of the things you may have noticed about me, even though there’s a lot of wor­ry­ing in the world at the moment is I’m not over­ly wor­ried about the share mar­ket.

(29:01)

Cameron Reil­ly: No, because you’ve got rules and prin­ci­ples that you fol­low, and it has worked for you in pre­vi­ous reces­sions and down­turns. And you see no rea­son why it won’t work this time. And by the way, they’re also sim­i­lar rules that oth­er val­ue investors, like War­ren Buf­fett and Char­lie Munger use. And so, you’re con­fi­dent that you’ve got a plan and you stick to the plan. And that’s what most of us don’t have when we get into invest­ing is we don’t have a plan. We do what you did in the ear­ly stages. Well, screw it up. And then after that, run around and try and read stuff and piece it all togeth­er. And there’s a lot of con­tra­dic­to­ry stuff out there, where­as you’ve ded­i­cat­ed decades of your life to fig­ur­ing it out and dis­till­ing it down to some­thing that dum­mies like me can under­stand.

(29:49)

Tony Kynas­ton: Exact­ly, right. Keep it sim­ple, that’s impor­tant too.

(29:53)

Cameron Reil­ly: That was a good oppor­tu­ni­ty for you to jump in there and say, you’re not a dum­my, Cam. Don’t put your­self down like that, but that momen­t’s gone.

(30:01)

Tony Kynas­ton: You need to DM on Skype when I get lines like that. No, well, you’re not done.

(30:08)

Cameron Reil­ly: Fol­low the script, Tony. It says right there in the script, no, Cameron, you’re not a dum­my and you’re very hand­some and well endowed. Just read, go to all this effort and you just don’t do your job.

(30:21)

Tony Kynas­ton: Back to deten­tion, I go.

(30:24)

Cameron Reil­ly: All right. So, let’s talk about the invest­ment lad­der, Tony, what is the invest­ment lad­der?

(30:31)

Tony Kynas­ton: Yeah. So, let me step back from val­ue invest­ing and say that a lot of peo­ple don’t get into invest­ing or direct invest­ing them­selves because they lead busy lives, and they have a career as a doc­tor or a nurse or a teacher or an archi­tect or what­ev­er. And hav­ing to spend time man­ag­ing their finances, is just real­ly not pos­si­ble because they’re so busy. Peo­ple may from time to time dab­ble in it and come in and out. But stick­ing to it full-time over a long peri­od of time does require a bit of a time. And I have to say that I’d be spend­ing maybe an hour or so a day, some­times more in peri­ods like we’re in now and there are lots hap­pen­ing or if com­pa­nies are report­ing but it can be done for kind of an hour or two a day.

But most peo­ple who are busy rais­ing fam­i­lies, they have oth­er lives, they don’t want to do that. So, let me just sort of out­line what I call the invest­ment step lad­der that might take you from being busy with your own career up a few rungs to being able to be more in con­trol of your own finances. And I have to say that if you stay on the bot­tom rung, that’s fine too. If it works for you, that’s great. There are four rungs to the lad­der. The first rung is, please if you have any sort of mon­ey invest­ed at all any­where, make sure you’re lim­it­ing your fees. I went through my father’s finances when he was very late in life and he was a very proud man who did­n’t like to ask for advice.

And when I did, I was just com­plete­ly blown away by how much he was pay­ing in fees for real­ly get­ting no ben­e­fit. And the first thing I’d say to peo­ple is to check what you’re pay­ing and what you’re get­ting. And so, how do you do that? Well, you com­pare it to the low­est cost oper­a­tor in the mar­ket. And that is a low-cost index fund. In the Aus­tralian mar­ket, for me, that means com­pa­nies like Aus­tralian Foun­da­tion Invest­ment. So, their code on the stock mar­ket is AFI. They’re what’s called a list­ed invest­ment com­pa­ny. So, it’s basi­cal­ly a man­aged fund that you can invest in, which is list­ed. So, when you go to invest in it you buy shares in the com­pa­ny rather than giv­ing them your mon­ey and they invest it on your behalf. Why do I like that com­pa­ny? Well, what they call the man­age­ment invest­ment, or the man­age­ment expense ratio is about 0.25 of 1%.

And that man­age­ment expense ratio is equiv­a­lent to the fees that the fund man­ag­er would charge you to man­age your mon­ey. So, that com­pa­ny gets basi­cal­ly the stock mar­ket aver­age return because they have big bas­kets of stocks it’s been around for over a hun­dred years. And so, they just con­tin­u­al­ly buy and sell and rebal­ance their hold­ings to resem­ble what the stock mar­ket looks like. And so, you get the aver­age returns. And as you said before, Cam the aver­age in the stock mar­ket is about 10% year on year. So, that’s not Sher­ry. I mean, if you think about the com­pa­nies that are out there on the stock mar­ket, I’d haz­ard a guess and say, half to three quar­ters, aren’t mak­ing that kind of return in their own busi­ness­es.

So, to be able to go out there and get 10% with the cost of it being a quar­ter of 1% is pret­ty good. And so, if your invest­ments aren’t get­ting that, please con­sid­er seek­ing finan­cial advice and mov­ing across into at least own­ing shares in some­thing like Aus­tralian Foun­da­tion Invest­ment. I don’t like giv­ing finan­cial advice, but that’s my rec­om­men­da­tion to inves­ti­gate. Go and get your own finan­cial advice and com­pare it. Now, I know some indus­try super funds offer a sim­i­lar kind of low fee ser­vice but again, look at all their fees. If you need to talk to them about their fees, you might find you’re pay­ing more than you think or seek finan­cial advice.

So, that’s, that’s step num­ber one, please lim­it your fees and please at least get the aver­age return on the share mar­ket. Step num­ber two though is okay if you’re at step num­ber one and you’re feel­ing like you’re pret­ty hap­py, stay there, but if you want to get bet­ter at ris­ing up the lad­der, then maybe you want to put togeth­er your own index fund. Because if you think about the way the index is struc­tured, real­ly the top 20 stocks by mar­ket cap are most of the index. I think it’s over 70% of the val­ue of the stock mar­ket by mar­ket cap­i­tal­iza­tion is con­tained in the top 20 stocks on the ASX.

So, it’s actu­al­ly not hard for you your­self to go out and buy an equiv­a­lent of your own index fund go and buy shares in the top 20 stocks and buy them in a ratio, which is equiv­a­lent to their mar­ket cap. So, you’re buy­ing more of CSL and BHP and maybe less of Wood­side or Wool­worths, or who­ev­er’s on the bot­tom of that list at the moment, but you can rea­son­ably and eas­i­ly put togeth­er your own index fund, and that’s just going to cost you the sheer bro­ker­age of doing that. And that will just cost you once when you trade. So, that’s poten­tial­ly even the cheap­er option for you.

And then maybe once every six months when the com­pa­nies report their lat­est earn­ings or 12 months, depend­ing on how you feel look up what the mar­ket caps are and look up who’s in that top 20, and maybe take out the one that’s fall­en out and add one that’s changed, that’s com­ing to the top 20. And so, you can, you can quite cheap­ly keep your own index fund going, again giv­ing you the aver­age return over the years for a very low cost. So, that’s step two. And step three is what you might say to your­self after you’ve done that for a while. Well, hang on, not all these top 20 com­pa­nies are giv­ing me the returns I want, I’m get­ting the aver­age return of them so, what’s dif­fer­ent here. And I cer­tain­ly went through that process.

And what I found was that the best return in the top 20 stocks, and I now do it for the top 10 stocks, because it’s a lit­tle bit eas­i­er than doing it for 20 is to say, if I can work out what I think each of these com­pa­nies will be worth next year. And I looked for the biggest dis­count between what I think the val­ue of that com­pa­ny is and what its cur­rent share price is. And I buy that com­pa­ny then should­n’t, I just get the return of it, clos­ing the gap, which is often above 10%. And the answer is yes, more times than not, you do that. And your return over time is going to be high­er than the 10% aver­age because you’re try­ing to pick the win­ner in that top 20 or top 10 port­fo­lios that you’re hold­ing.

And once you get good at doing that, and you start to under­stand how to val­ue com­pa­nies then log­ic will lead you to the next ques­tion of, well, why just learn myself of the top 10 or 20 com­pa­nies on the share mar­ket sure­ly, there are com­pa­nies out there which aren’t in the top 10 or 20, which are grow­ing much faster or pre­sent­ing bet­ter val­ue to us than that top 20 list of com­pa­nies. And that’s the case. And that’s where we are with our QAV invest­ing frame­work.

(37:55)

Cameron Reil­ly: Nice­ly done. So, this is around your lev­el of risk that you’re ready to take your lev­el of sophis­ti­ca­tion or edu­ca­tion that you cur­rent­ly have, or are will­ing to devel­op in terms of becom­ing an investor, the amount of effort that you’re able to put in or will­ing to put in. So, the first one is the eas­i­est, low­est effort, the low­est risk for the best pos­si­ble return. And then increas­ing­ly gets a lit­tle bit more sophis­ti­cat­ed, a lit­tle bit more risk but for bet­ter returns.

(38:29)

Tony Kynas­ton: Yes. Or low­er costs.

(38:31)

Cameron Reil­ly: Or low­er costs. Yep. Well, that’s bet­ter returns too, right? Because.

(38:35)

Tony Kynas­ton: Oh, it is you’re right. Yes, good point.

(38:37)

Cameron Reil­ly: The cost comes off the returns. All right, Tony. Well, I guess that leads us to lev­el four then QAV which involves the check­list. And so, maybe we start talk­ing about the con­cept of the check­list. Prob­a­bly won’t have time in this episode to get too deep into how it works in detail. We’ll leave that for the next episode, but maybe we can talk about what it is and how it works, and why you devel­oped it. And I just want to say to peo­ple if you’re lis­ten­ing to this and you’re one of our QAV club sub­scribers, you can go to our web­site and down­load the check­list, the Excel spread­sheet, the lat­est ver­sion of it, just go to the port­fo­lio and check­list tab. You’ll find links there for QAV sub­scribers. You’ll be able to get a copy of that for every­one else, if you’re just tun­ing in and then get­ting a feel for it we’ll try and explain it ver­bal­ly bit by bit.

(39:35)

Tony Kynas­ton: Yeah. So, why I check­list? Well, I start­ed using a check­list to guide my invest­ing about sev­en or eight years ago. So, I haven’t always used it. But it came about when I read a book called the check­list man­i­festo about a doc­tor who said, I’m a sur­geon and I’m in a hos­pi­tal and we have too many patients who die from basic mis­takes or who relapse and come back in with oth­er prob­lems because of mis­takes we caused dur­ing surgery. And so, he cast around and said, well, is there a bet­ter way of doing sur­gi­cal pro­ce­dures where we make few­er mis­takes?

And he looked at the air­line indus­try and he was amazed that air­lines oper­ate with a very, very, very low crash ratio or inci­dent ratio com­pared to the num­ber of planes in the air. And he said, well, how does that hap­pen in the air­line indus­try, but not in the hos­pi­tals. We’re both indus­tries run by smart peo­ple. And what he found was that pilots will go through a check­list espe­cial­ly before they take off. And they’ll make sure that all the func­tions in the plane, are ser­vice­able and work­ing, and they’ll go through the whole process line by line. They won’t skip any lines. If there’s a prob­lem, they’ll stop.

And they’ll sort the prob­lem out before they take off. And he thought that’s a great idea. I can apply it to a hos­pi­tal envi­ron­ment. So, as the patient comes in at the start of the process, the doc­tors and the nurs­es go through a whole check­list of pro­ce­dures to make sure that we’re doing the right surgery, that the patient is who we thought they were and blah, blah, blah that every­thing in there in the oper­at­ing room is, as it should be, all the instru­ments are ster­il­ized, et cetera, et cetera.

And he found that by apply­ing a check­list to surgery in his hos­pi­tal, the relapse rates and the patient care went up. And so, I thought that’s a great idea. How do I apply it to what I do? And so, I start­ed to sys­tem­atize what I did and up until that point, I had a lot of heuris­tics and I would apply them at dif­fer­ent times, giv­en the sit­u­a­tions, again, always going back to Buf­fett and Munger and Gra­ham to guide me. But over time, you kind of dis­till things that you’ll look at. And I decid­ed to put those down into a check­list, which itself has evolved over time as well. And I’ve empha­sized some things and less­ened the empha­sis on oth­ers, added some things, tak­ing them out. And that’s where we are. It’s a process that guides me in invest­ing.

(42:06)

Cameron Reil­ly: And I want to just let peo­ple know that from my per­spec­tive, the most excit­ing aspect of the check­list is it only uses num­bers. So, the way that the check­list allows us to eval­u­ate any par­tic­u­lar stock and deter­mine whether or not it deserves a buy rat­ing or not, it’s all about look­ing at pub­licly avail­able num­bers. I don’t need to be an expert on the trav­el indus­try or the med­ical goods indus­try or the what­ev­er indus­try After­pay is the lay-by indus­try, the fake lay-by indus­try, the fake cred­it indus­try, or the min­ing indus­try, or the tele­coms indus­try. I don’t need to be an expert in these things because Tony’s fig­ured out a way to get the num­bers, to tell that sto­ry. And we can get those num­bers from a vari­ety of dif­fer­ent sources.

We’ll talk about the data ser­vices in a minute, but it enables us to use the num­bers and the dif­fer­ent scores and rat­ings. That oth­er ser­vices give that par­tic­u­lar stock to get an overview of its cur­rent finan­cial and man­age­ment health and the pre­dict­ed future finan­cial and by the per­for­mance aspects of the busi­ness from peo­ple who are experts, ana­lysts, who do study these indus­tries, study these busi­ness­es, and hope­ful­ly have a good idea of what’s going on. It enables us to gath­er a sum­ma­ry of a num­ber of dif­fer­ent kinds of data and put it into a lit­tle frame­work and spits out a score at the end. It’s a bril­liant piece of con­den­sa­tion.

I always say it’s Tony’s equals MC squared. He looked at all of this com­plex stuff and he con­densed it down to 20 ques­tions and a star at the end. So, not want­i­ng to blow too much smoke up your ass, Tony, but I think you deserve a Nobel Prize for it. I’m putting you for that I’ve sub­mit­ted you to be the Pope and to get a Nobel Prize next year for this. And the oth­er good thing about it is as you always say, Look, it’s a guide­line, it’s not a rule. Or as I’ve been say­ing, it’s a tool, not a reli­gion. The check­list. Yeah. It guides us. And there are times when you or any­one using it can decide, they’re going to make excep­tions to a rule it’s to help us invest, but it’s not a reli­gion.

You’re not going to spend eter­ni­ty in hell­fire and damna­tion. If you mod­i­fy it, change it how­ev­er you want. But I would check with Tony before you change it. It’s just up to me. There may be good rea­sons why he’s got it the way it is.

(44:57)

Tony Kynas­ton: Well, I think that’s a good point though. I do see the check­list as being an evo­lu­tion­ary process. It’s not set-in cement. I’m hop­ing that some of our lis­ten­ers might come back in time and say, look, I’ve got bet­ter returns than you. I did this and that. And we can com­pare notes over­all through all our lis­ten­ers and come up with a bet­ter check­list. I might change it going for­ward myself. That’s how it evolved to where it is now. Yeah. But yeah, I mean, you’re right. Towards the end of my career, prob­a­bly the sec­ond half of my career, I got heav­i­ly involved in data. Back when it was sort of very ear­ly on before big data was a thing before Mon­ey­ball was writ­ten, all that kind of stuff. So, I worked in loy­al­ty pro­grams. I was a data­base mar­ket­ing expert who ran a direct mar­ket­ing com­pa­ny or sor­ry, drip mar­ket­ing retail­er.

So, I had a lot to do with data. So, that kind of look­ing for the sto­ry and the num­bers real­ly appealed to me when it came to invest­ing and it also kind of backs up one of the things that Buf­fett said. He said he thinks it’s been a real advan­tage for him liv­ing in Oma­ha and not Wall Street because he’s not swayed by what peo­ple say he’s swayed by the num­bers. And based on dis­cus­sions we’ve had recent­ly; CEOs are often chief belief offi­cers or chief preach­ing offi­cers. They’re out there to con­vince peo­ple that their com­pa­nies are great and going to last for­ev­er and keep grow­ing. But we have to kind of switch off that noise and look at the facts under­neath.

(46:24)

Cameron Reil­ly: Well, one of the dif­fi­cult things, obvi­ous­ly for peo­ple with invest­ing is it’s very emo­tion­al in good times and in bad times for dif­fer­ent rea­sons and human beings are dri­ven by emo­tions. And it seems to me that a lot of the mis­takes that peo­ple make with invest­ing cer­tain­ly this is my case in the few dab­bles that I’ve had over the decades before meet­ing you, were based on emo­tion. Well, I like this guy, and this is a friend of mine’s com­pa­ny, or I like this sto­ry, or I like this prod­uct, or I don’t want to miss out. Every­thing’s going up. I should get on. I don’t want to be the one idiot who missed out on this thing, or, oh my God, every­thing’s falling off a cliff. I bet­ter sell every­thing imme­di­ate­ly. Or it’s going to go down zero and I’m going to lose every­thing.

And the thing about the check­list is it gives us rel­a­tive­ly sim­ple. Once you get your head around it, and there’s a learn­ing curve there, I think it took me six to 12 months to feel com­fort­able with it. But it’s a set of guide­lines, a set of rules that takes the emo­tion out of it. The score is either pos­i­tive or it’s neg­a­tive, that’s it. Does­n’t mat­ter what’s going on. Does­n’t mat­ter if it’s a bull mar­ket or a bear mar­ket, does­n’t mat­ter if the sky is falling or the roads are paved with gold. There is a score, and the score is a score, does­n’t mat­ter what’s going on. All I need to do is pull the num­bers, look at the score. And that tells me what I need to know.

And it just enables me to go, okay, well, as long as you believe in the check­list and you believe in the frame­work and we believe in you and I have it on good author­i­ty from your wife, that you’re actu­al­ly not the Mes­si­ah. You’re just a very naughty boy. But I think that’s the prob­lem for brand new peo­ple lis­ten­ing to this is unlike me. I mean, they don’t know either of us. I’ve known you for over a decade and I’ve been to sev­er­al of your hous­es in dif­fer­ent parts of the world at dif­fer­ent times. I know your wife very well. I know your daugh­ter very well. I think I know you pret­ty well either, you’re the world’s great­est con man play­ing a real­ly, real­ly long con on me. Or you’re the real deal. And I tend to think you’re the real deal.

(48:48)

Tony Kynas­ton: If I was a good con man would­n’t I try and con some­one with some mon­ey.

(48:50)

Cameron Reil­ly: Well, yeah, you’ve just been fund­ing my projects, not get­ting mon­ey out of my projects. So, you’re a long-term bad con man.

(48:59)

Tony Kynas­ton: Maybe you’re the con man.

(49:06)

Cameron Reil­ly: Yeah. Well, you would­n’t be the first per­son to say that. And so, for peo­ple lis­ten­ing to this for the first time, look, you don’t know me, you don’t know Tony. And you’re like, why should I lis­ten to this guy? Well, lis­ten, we’ve got a lot of peo­ple who’ve been lis­ten­ing to this show now for over a year, you can lis­ten to them and read their tes­ti­mo­ni­als. And some of them have been on the show. We’ve had them on as guests and a lot of them are very suc­cess­ful peo­ple in their own right. And they can back it up as well. So, we under­stand that. Why the hell should I trust you guys?

But the point is, once you do trust Tony, and then you trust the check­list, it removes that emo­tion and pan­ic and fear from the sce­nario. But he may not be there today, but keep lis­ten­ing, lis­ten to enough episodes and you’ll get a sense for your­self, I guess, as to whether or not you think Tony is full of shit, or he actu­al­ly knows what he’s talk­ing about. The oth­er thing.

(49:59)

Tony Kynas­ton: Sor­ry, And I’m going to be the anti-CEO here. Don’t trust us. That’s why we’re run­ning a port­fo­lio our­selves on the check­list and on our web­site. When we get enough runs on the board, look at that, Hey, if you want to fol­low us and fol­low along, do it on paper for a while. And then just when you get com­fort­able and can trust us based on our results then yeah. Go for it.

(50:24)

Cameron Reil­ly: Yeah. And if you’re a skep­ti­cal per­son, that’s fine. Be skep­ti­cal as long as you want. We’re not in any hur­ry. And look, you’re going to look at our port­fo­lio right now, which we start­ed on the 2nd of Sep­tem­ber, the pub­lic port­fo­lio. Of course, it right now in March of 2020 is way under­wa­ter like every­thing else is, but we’re not as far under­wa­ter as The ASX is as the index is. And of course, that’s, our job is to beat the index. So, when things are going up, we want to go up being bet­ter than the index. When things are going down, we want to go down less than the index.

And so far, that’s what we’ve been doing up until Jan­u­ary or ear­ly Feb­ru­ary. We were per­form­ing much bet­ter than the index going up. Now, we’ve dropped less than the index, but yes, this isn’t mag­ic. If the world is in a glob­al mar­ket cor­rec­tion, we’re going to get swept up in that. But because we’re in the mid­dle of a cor­rec­tion, stocks are get­ting very, very cheap. And right now, we’re plan­ning what we’re going to be doing when the inevitable turn­around comes, and the mar­ket starts to pick back up again because we should talk a lit­tle bit about that. The advan­tages or why a cor­rec­tion is actu­al­ly a pos­i­tive thing from an invest­ment per­spec­tive.

(51:49)

Tony Kynas­ton: Yeah, it is. I mean, peo­ple say buy a share and hold it for life. And that will def­i­nite­ly work for peo­ple. And I’m not going to argue against that, but I can get bet­ter returns than that because our process tells us to go to cash at some stages. And if we’re in cash, when the mar­ket is drop­ping, then we’re going to out­per­form the mar­ket albeit, we still might be neg­a­tive. But the ben­e­fit of that is when the mar­ket turns around, we have a lot to deploy and we get a big­ger bang for our buck than the mar­ket would give us if we were just pas­sive­ly invest­ed the whole time,

(52:23)

Cameron Reil­ly: War­ren Buf­fet­t’s got a say­ing, be fear­ful when oth­ers are greedy and greedy when oth­ers are fear­ful. And at times like this, and while the mar­ket bot­toms out most, par­tic­u­lar­ly of those new investors that we talked about before, who don’t have a plan don’t have a sys­tem will be fear­ful still, even if the mar­ket starts to pick back up again, because they’ll be wor­ried that it’s, what’s known as a dead cat bounce, but you’ve got a sys­tem for know­ing when it’s rel­a­tive­ly safe to buy back in. And so, we’ll get in when the mar­ket is still rel­a­tive­ly low and ride it all the way back up again.

(52:59)

Tony Kynas­ton: Yeah. And with a big­ger abil­i­ty to invest than if we had stayed in the mar­ket the whole time.

(53:06)

Cameron Reil­ly: One oth­er thing I want to cov­er before we get off the intro­duc­tion to the check­list stuff is the cof­fee shop anal­o­gy. When you start­ed using that it made a big dif­fer­ence to me and helped me get my head around it. So, basi­cal­ly, you helped me under­stand that buy­ing stock in a busi­ness is exact­ly the same as if I was going to buy a small busi­ness, like a local cof­fee shop. Do you want to sort of walk through the cof­fee shop anal­o­gy a bit?

(53:31)

Tony Kynas­ton: Yeah, sure. So, I think one of the prob­lems with the finan­cial ser­vices indus­try is that if peo­ple make it more com­plex, they know they can charge big­ger fees to demys­ti­fy it for you. So, I think that’s a real prob­lem with our, but the con­cepts over­all are fair­ly sim­ple, and the trick is to reduce a com­plex set of reports down to some­thing which we can read­i­ly under­stand. And prob­a­bly the eas­i­est busi­ness to under­stand is a sim­ple shop down the road. So, as I was talk­ing to you now and look­ing out the win­dow of the cof­fee shop. So, I use the cof­fee shop analy­sis and we all know how they run as a busi­ness.

So, I have to either buy or rent some space. I have to buy a cap­puc­ci­no machine. I have to fit it out with fur­ni­ture, tables, and chairs. And I have some stock I need to buy cof­fee beans, maybe some muffins, et cetera. And I have cus­tomers who come in and buy things off me. So, it’s a fair­ly sim­ple trans­ac­tion­al busi­ness. But we can hope­ful­ly reduce even the biggest com­plex busi­ness­es down to those same sorts of thought process­es. I’ve got things I sell; I’ve got the cost to do that. And I’ve got to decide whether I want to buy that cof­fee shop or that big busi­ness based on the met­rics of the avail­able data.

(54:51)

Cameron Reil­ly: Yeah. And it real­ly helps me take things that are poten­tial­ly fair­ly abstract. We talk about PE ratios and price to cash ratios and earn­ings per share and future earn­ings per share and all these sorts of things. But when I think of them in terms of a cof­fee shop, and I guess that’s the oth­er, thing that isn’t nec­es­sar­i­ly obvi­ous or self-evi­dent to peo­ple that are new to this, is that when War­ren Buf­fett or Char­lie Munger or Tony Kynas­ton is buy­ing a stock in a com­pa­ny, you are actu­al­ly lit­er­al­ly think­ing of your­selves as get­ting into busi­ness with a com­pa­ny you’re look­ing at it, not as an abstract fig­ure or a dot on a graph.

You’re going well, is this busi­ness mak­ing mon­ey and how is it per­form­ing and what do I think that’s worth? So, when we bring that back to the cof­fee shop anal­o­gy, it’s like say­ing, okay, well, I’m look­ing at buy­ing this cof­fee shop. They say the price is a hun­dred thou­sand dol­lars. Well, what’s it got in terms of its assets? How much mon­ey does it make? How long will it take for the busi­ness to return enough prof­it to neu­tral­ize my pur­chase price of the busi­ness? What do I think the chances are that it’s going to con­tin­ue, or that its rev­enue is going to grow over the next few years? How long do I think the busi­ness is going to grow for?

What if I invest a hun­dred thou­sand dol­lars in it now how long is it not only going to take to pay me back that price? And what is the risk asso­ci­at­ed with the length of time that I have to wait?

Is it one year? Is it five years? Is it ten years? Obvi­ous­ly the longer it takes for it to return my ini­tial pur­chase price, the more risk is involved because any­thing could hap­pen. A Coro­n­avirus could hit, and every­thing could go to shit. Or how long do I think it’s going to return prof­its over and above that. And there­fore, makes me mul­ti­ple times my invest­ment, these are easy enough con­cepts for me to under­stand when it comes to a lit­tle cof­fee shop. And so, what we will do as we go through explain­ing the check­list is to try and explain each of the data points and the scor­ing of those data points as if it was a lit­tle cof­fee shop. And it just real­ly helps me get my head around the data points and why they’re impor­tant and what they stand for.

(57:18)

Tony Kynas­ton: And I think that I could be wrong, but I think the pen­ny dropped with you when we start­ed to talk about how long it will take me to get my mon­ey back if I buy that cof­fee shop at this price.

(27:28)

Cameron Reil­ly: Yeah, absolute­ly.

(57:28)

Tony Kynas­ton: That brought in the whole dis­cus­sion about risk. The longer it takes, the more risk there is, and there­fore I should try and get it paid back quick­er. And that sort of, I think was a bit of an eye-open­er in terms of why we’re focus­ing on val­ue in our invest­ments.

(57:42)

Cameron Reil­ly: Yeah, absolute­ly. No, it is. A light bulb went off when you first put it in that ter­mi­nol­o­gy. And I real­ly start­ed to under­stand more about what was going on. Think­ing of these things, is this real­ly a busi­ness that, if you look at the dif­fer­ence between, I don’t know, a gold min­er, let’s say in an After­pay, if you were War­ren Buf­fett and you had a bil­lion dol­lars and they said, Hey, you want to come in and be a part­ner in the busi­ness as it is right now, would I real­ly want to get in, would I want to throw a bil­lion dol­lars in this would I real­ly want to become part­ners with these guys look­ing at the busi­ness at that lev­el?

Do I real­ly believe in the prospects of this com­pa­ny and that it’s going to be prof­itable, long-term, et cetera, et cetera? And as I was explain­ing to one of my 19-year-old boys yes­ter­day, when he was talk­ing about whether or not he should have bought into Bit­coin last week, one of the oth­er things you’ve helped me under­stand is the dif­fer­ence between invest­ing and gam­bling. Do you want to explain how you would define those two?

(58:42)

Tony Kynas­ton: Yeah, well, we are buy­ing pieces of com­pa­nies, so, the com­pa­nies can be ana­lyzed. We can work out what we want to pay for those com­pa­nies, what we think those com­pa­nies are worth. And we can go along for the ride with man­age­ment, if we invest in them, that’s invest­ing. If we have no way of valu­ing some­thing, if we have no under­stand­ing of it, if we have no knowl­edge of the indus­try it oper­ates on, or what dri­ves the price up and down, then we’re gam­bling. That’s the basic dif­fer­ence. And gen­er­al­ly, I mean, if you look at the BRW rich list or IFR rich list what­ev­er it is now, there aren’t any, maybe except for David Walsh in Tas­ma­nia, there aren’t any bil­lion­aires on that list who are gam­blers or who got their mon­ey through gam­bling.

There are plen­ty of bil­lion­aires on that list who got it through invest­ing either direct­ly in com­pa­nies or on the share mar­ket or in real estate. So, if you can’t artic­u­late the oper­a­tion or the com­pa­ny, you’re buy­ing a piece of, and whether or not it’s a good price that you’re pay­ing for it, then it’s spec­u­la­tion. It’s gam­bling.

(59:49)

Cameron Reil­ly: Yeah. I mean, it’s luck. I mean, if your only ratio­nale is, I think it’s going to go up, or I think it’s going to go down, there’s no sci­ence behind that, there’s no intel­li­gence behind that. It’s a guess which comes down to luck, which is gam­bling.

(01:00:06)

Tony Kynas­ton: Yeah. And some­times you’ll get it right. And a lot of times you’ll get it wrong. Yeah, that’s exact­ly what it is. It’s spec­u­la­tion. What you’re try­ing to do in those cas­es is buy some­thing and then sell it to the greater fool. So, part of that say­ing is acknowl­edg­ing the fact that you’re a fool in the first place. And then the oth­er one is hop­ing that there’s going to be a greater fool down the track who will buy it off you for a high­er price. Some­times you’re the greater fool.

(01:00:30)

Cameron Reil­ly: And the prob­lem with luck is we know from coin toss exper­i­ments, that it’s basi­cal­ly 50/50. So, luck is not a long, I used to say this when I was a mar­ket­ing con­sul­tant, run­ning mar­ket­ing strate­gies for clients, luck is not a long-term strat­e­gy for suc­cess. Let’s put some sci­ence behind what you’re doing and why, just throw­ing on the wall and hop­ing some of it sticks is not a real­ly great strat­e­gy.

(01:00:56)

Tony Kynas­ton: Buf­fett has a good eye for what we’re talk­ing about, he says, if you’re sit­ting at a pok­er table play­ing pok­er and you look around the table and you can’t tell who the Pat­sy is, you’re the Pat­sy

(01:01:08)

Cameron Reil­ly: And his oth­er one is a ris­ing tide, may car­ry ships. But it’s only when the tide goes out that you get to see who’s been swim­ming naked. I like that one too.

(01:01:15)

Tony Kynas­ton: Yeah. This is what we’re doing at the moment, the ris­ing tide stopped in about Jan­u­ary.

(01:01:20)

Cameron Reil­ly: Yeah. All right. Well, lis­ten, let’s leave episode one of the reboots there, I think Tony in our next episode, will start to get into the detail of the check­list. We’ll explain it step by step. We’ll explain the dif­fer­ent places you can get data from. And we’ll take peo­ple through the check­list process. And again, as I said ear­li­er if you want to down­load these. I should explain this too. We have free episodes each week. And we have pre­mi­um episodes this week. The free episodes are for peo­ple who are just check­ing it out, or maybe want to learn a lit­tle bit more about invest­ing, but they’re not real­ly hard­core seri­ous.

They’re not ready to ded­i­cate seri­ous ener­gy to become suc­cess­ful investors. For the peo­ple that want to be seri­ous investors for the hard­core peo­ple. That’s what our pre­mi­um series is for. If you’re a pre­mi­um sub­scriber, you get the check­list and there are extra newslet­ters and videos and episodes, extra episodes, longer episodes. So, you can get a two-week free tri­al to become a QAV Club Mem­ber. Just go to our web­site, qavpodcast.com.au. QAV, by the way, if you haven’t worked out yet stands for qual­i­ty and val­ue, we’re look­ing at both qual­i­ty and val­ue when we’re work­ing out whether or not we should buy a stock.

So, you go to qavpodcast.com.au look for a 14-day free tri­al thing. You can down­load every­thing, lis­ten to all the pre­mi­um episodes, see all the videos every­thing’s there for 14-days, and you can decide whether or not you want to keep going with it or not after that. So, with that, just one more reminder, don’t take any­thing you heard on this as finan­cial advice. We are not finan­cial advi­sors. This is for edu­ca­tion­al pur­pos­es only, and good luck out there. Stay safe, wash your hands, and we’ll be back next week with part two of the review.

(01:03:11)

Tony Kynas­ton: Or as I call it pod­cast atten­tion. Alright, thanks, Cam. That was great.

Secret Link